Arrested in Luxembourg: 24 hours, and the investigating judge

Luxembourg gives the police a short window and no more. A preliminary investigation is ordered by the State Prosecutor, the police may question and hold a suspect only within that window, and where an investigating judge is appointed it is that judge who decides whether to charge and which measures apply. Detention before trial is ordered by the judge and is open to review.
The country concentrates funds, holding structures and private banking in a very small territory, and its serious caseload follows: money laundering, unauthorised financial activity, tax matters and asset seizures, frequently arising from a request originating elsewhere. For a foreign client the practical question is usually not a prosecution here but a Luxembourg dimension of a case running in another country, with accounts frozen, records requested or a company examined on this territory.
Avv. Massimo Romano — Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553, patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015 — Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138 — +39 335 669 3954
In brief
- Police custody here is short and questioning takes place inside it, which makes the hours before any interview the ones in which the defence is actually prepared.
- The State Prosecutor orders the preliminary investigation and the police act under that direction, so the police view is not the decision on how the case proceeds.
- Where an investigating judge is appointed, that judge decides on the charge and on the measures, and detention ordered in that way remains reviewable.
- Entitlement to a lawyer and to interpretation exists under the applicable directives, but both are asked for expressly rather than offered as a matter of routine.
- Proceedings run in French, German or Luxembourgish, and which language applies decides who can act and what has to be translated.
- The financial sector produces the heavy files: money laundering, unauthorised activity, tax matters and asset seizures, often triggered by a request from abroad.
- Many of these matters are the local part of a case elsewhere, so what happens here concerns records, accounts and structures rather than a local prosecution.
- Cross-border workers live in neighbouring countries and work here, which means the facts straddle a frontier and more than one authority has an interest.
- Road traffic through the corridors, the airport and the freight hub add customs, consignment and alert-based cases, and companies face proceedings alongside individuals.
- Only a lawyer admitted here can appear before the courts, so an Italian lawyer's part is selection, briefing and anything with an Italian end.
The Luxembourg clock
| Step | Rule | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Police custody | A maximum of 24 hours | Questioning takes place in that window |
| Preliminary investigation | Ordered by the State Prosecutor | Police act under that direction |
| Investigating judge | Appointed where the case requires it | Decides on charge and on measures |
| Pre-trial detention | Ordered by the judge | Reviewable |
| Lawyer and interpreter | Rights implemented under EU directives | Ask expressly |
| Languages | Proceedings in French, German or Luxembourgish | Affects who can act |
A financial centre, and what follows from it
Luxembourg concentrates funds, holding structures and private banking in a very small country, and its serious criminal caseload follows: money laundering, unauthorised financial activity, tax matters and asset seizures, frequently arising from a request originating elsewhere.
For a foreign client the practical question is usually not a Luxembourg prosecution but a Luxembourg dimension of a case running in another country — accounts frozen here, records requested here, a company incorporated here. The framework is in the guide on cross-border investigations.
The rest of the caseload
- Cross-border workers, tens of thousands of whom live in France, Belgium or Germany and work here, with facts that straddle a border.
- Road traffic on the corridors through the country, including customs and cash movements.
- The airport and the freight hub: customs, consignments and alert-based arrests.
- Corporate proceedings, with the entity exposed alongside individuals.
- Ordinary city cases: nightlife, theft accusations, driving.
The multilingual point is practical rather than cultural: proceedings run in French, German or Luxembourgish, and which one applies determines who can act and what has to be translated.
Several authorities act in a Luxembourg case and their powers do not overlap. The table sets out who decides what.
| Who | What they decide | What lies outside their power |
|---|---|---|
| The police | How to conduct questioning within the custody window. | Whether to charge, or whether detention continues. |
| The State Prosecutor | That a preliminary investigation is opened and how it is directed. | The measures affecting liberty once a judge is appointed. |
| The investigating judge | Whether to charge and which measures apply. | The outcome of the case itself. |
| The defence lawyer | What is said, when, and what is produced on measures. | Access to material the judge has not yet released. |
| The foreign authority | What it asks for by way of assistance. | How that request is executed on this territory. |
Where an Italian lawyer comes in
Only a lawyer admitted in Luxembourg can appear before its courts. The Italian side covers the rest: selecting and briefing that lawyer, explaining the position to the family in their own language, and handling anything with an Italian end — a parallel proceeding, a warrant issued by Italy, an alert in circulation. The model is in how a correspondent case is run.
Frequently asked questions
How long can Luxembourg police hold me?
A maximum of twenty-four hours. After that an investigating judge, where one has been appointed, decides on charge and on measures.
My accounts here have been frozen.
That usually arises from a request originating in another country. The challenge belongs partly here and partly in the state that issued it.
I live in France and work in Luxembourg.
That is the ordinary situation here, and it means facts can straddle a border. Which authority is proceeding, and on what, is the first thing to establish.
Which language will the case be in?
French, German or Luxembourgish depending on the case. It determines who can act and what must be translated.
If this is happening now
First contact is free and covered by professional privilege, at any hour including nights and holidays.
Who reaches this page from a Luxembourg arrest
A family has had a short telephone call to say that a relative has been detained in Luxembourg. The person may be a cross-border worker who lives in a neighbouring country, a manager of a company with a seat in the Grand Duchy, a traveller on the road between larger cities or someone visiting a bank. The family holds a name, a city and a word, and wants to know what happens in the next day and who decides.
Another reader is the person who has been held, questioned and perhaps released, and who has been told that a preliminary investigation has been ordered by the State Prosecutor and that an investigating judge may be appointed. The structure is unfamiliar to many Italians, and the person wants to know what each step means and what rights they have at each of them.
A further reader works in finance, fund management, company administration or the professions that surround them. Luxembourg is a financial centre, and cases there often begin not with a street arrest but with a request, an inquiry or a freeze connected to events elsewhere. These readers are frequently surprised that a sophisticated and quiet environment can produce a sudden detention.
Some readers have an Italian link: a person arrested on an Italian European Arrest Warrant, someone who suspects one exists, or someone whose Luxembourg business is tied to an Italian investigation. All of them need the same orientation: the police may hold a suspect only briefly, and then an investigating judge takes over. What is said and signed in the meantime matters more than people expect.
Most files here concerning foreign clients are the local part of a case abroad. The table compares the situations.
| Situation | Where the case really sits | What is done here |
|---|---|---|
| An account frozen locally | In the country investigating the facts. | Challenging the measure and the extent of what is held. |
| Records requested from a bank | Abroad, with assistance sought here. | Testing the request and protecting what is privileged. |
| A holding structure examined | Partly here and partly abroad. | Documenting the role and the decisions actually taken. |
| An arrest on an alert at the airport | In the country that issued it. | The hearing on surrender, and the conditions of release. |
| An ordinary local matter | Entirely here. | The whole defence, in the language of the proceedings. |
Decisions before the investigating judge takes over
The earliest decision is whether to speak. The police may question and hold a suspect only for a limited time, and officers may ask for an account at once, in a calm and efficient manner. What you say is recorded, translated and compared with what you say afterwards. Waiting for a lawyer may lengthen the day and appear less cooperative; speaking costs you control over a statement that cannot be withdrawn. Because the police window is short, the pressure to speak early is strong.
The next decision is about the lawyer. You have the right to a lawyer and to an interpreter, and you should ask expressly for both. The lawyer provided may meet you only briefly before the questioning or the hearing. Appointing your own means someone outside must find, brief and pay a lawyer in Luxembourg while managing everything else. The trade is between a convenient lawyer and a prepared one, and in a short procedure preparation is the scarce thing.
A further decision concerns what happens before the investigating judge. The judge decides whether to charge and what measures apply, including whether to order pre-trial detention. You can contest the grounds and bring evidence of ties, which takes documents assembled at speed, or you can accept the process and rely on review. Contesting needs preparation and can fail if it is rushed; accepting risks a heavier measure than was needed.
Finally, choose a single person at home to relay messages and hold papers, and ask everyone else to wait until the position is clear.
What to put together while the police window is open
A lawyer can only argue from what exists on paper. Collect what you can, photograph rather than move originals and keep copies in more than one place.
- Passport or identity card and any residence, work or cross-border worker papers, scanned in full.
- The time and place of detention as exactly as you know them, because the limit on police custody is counted from that moment.
- Every document you were given, in its original language, photographed whole. Do not rely on a spoken summary.
- The names of officers and interpreters you dealt with, what was said about your rights, and whether you asked for a lawyer and when.
- Evidence of ties: an employment letter, a lease, family records, company registration, proof of residence. The judge asks whether you would stay and answer the case.
- Business and banking papers if the case is financial: statements, contracts, correspondence and the names of advisers, shared only with your lawyers.
- Any Italian paper connected to the matter, such as a summons, a warrant or a notice, and whether you have been investigated in Italy before.
- Phone and account information your lawyer should know about, shared only with the lawyer.
- Medical information and medicines that custody staff must know about.
Write down what is missing as well. A short honest list lets the lawyer decide where to look first.
How a Luxembourg arrest disrupts ordinary life
The immediate effect is that the person is gone. A detainee cannot answer calls, open email or move money, and people who depend on that person notice within hours. A colleague waiting in a meeting, a client expecting a signature, a family that has not heard since morning: each fills the silence with explanations of its own, and some will be wrong.
For a cross-border worker, the consequences reach the job and the commute. An employer that learns of the matter may suspend work at once, and a permit tied to employment may be at risk. Release may come with conditions on movement or a requirement to report, which interact with the daily routine of living in one country and working in another. A household that depends on a Luxembourg salary has to find a way through the weeks ahead.
For a manager or adviser in the financial sector, the effects reach reputation and money. Banks and counterparties react quickly, accounts may be questioned and clients may leave before the facts are known. Professional licences and positions of trust can be affected before any decision has been reached, and a company may need to decide urgently who signs and who speaks for it.
For families, the case creates costs that are easy to underestimate: travel, translation of papers, fees for a local lawyer and an Italian one, and weeks away from work. Write down early who pays for what, who holds the papers and who speaks to the employer and the bank, so that routine questions do not become crises.
Questions to ask a lawyer about the Luxembourg procedure
These are the questions people outside the profession rarely think to ask, and the answers shape the days ahead.
- Has a preliminary investigation been ordered, and has an investigating judge been appointed?
- How long can the police hold me, and what happens when that time ends?
- What will the investigating judge decide, and what grounds might support pre-trial detention?
- What evidence of ties will matter most, and how quickly can it be produced?
- Will you or a colleague attend the questioning and the hearing in person?
- How is the interpreter chosen, and can I object if the translation is poor?
- If detention is ordered, how is it reviewed and by whom?
- Does any Italian proceeding or warrant exist, and would it change how we handle the hearing?
- What should my family tell my employer, bank and clients, and what should they avoid?
If an answer is unclear, ask again. A defender who explains the file, the options and the cost of each in words you can repeat to your family is showing you how the case will be run, and you should leave every conversation knowing what comes next and who is responsible for it.
Keep the answers in a notebook with the date beside each, and share them with the relative who is coordinating at home. When the same question gets a different answer on a later day, say so to the lawyer at once, because a changed answer usually means that something in the file has changed.
The language of the proceedings is a practical question with immediate effects. The table sets out what it determines.
| Question | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Which lawyers can appear | Only those able to conduct the case in the language chosen for it. |
| How documents reach you | In that language, with translation requested as a separate step. |
| Questioning | Conducted in that language, with an interpreter asked for expressly. |
| What must be translated for Italy | Decisions and requests that an Italian lawyer has to work from. |
| Timing | Translation takes time, so it is arranged before deadlines arrive. |
Habits that harm a defence in a quiet jurisdiction
Most damage in these cases is done by people trying to help themselves. Avoid the following.
- Do not sign what you cannot read. A signature is taken as agreement to the text, whatever was said aloud.
- Do not talk about the case with officers, interpreters or other detainees. None of them owes you confidentiality.
- Do not discuss the facts on calls or visits with relatives or colleagues. Conversations may be monitored and later requested.
- Do not post or message about the matter on social media or in group chats.
- Do not delete anything from phones, email, company systems or cloud accounts. Removal looks like concealment.
- Do not move money or documents to protect them. It looks like hiding assets and can invite further measures.
- Do not assume a calm atmosphere means a small case. Courteous officers say nothing about what the prosecutor intends.
- Do not change your account between hearings without advice. Inconsistency hurts more than silence.
Each rule keeps your options open until a defender who has seen the file can advise you.
If you have already done one of these things, do not panic and do not try to repair it yourself. Tell your lawyer exactly what happened, in plain words and without softening it, so that the defence can take it into account before anyone else raises it. Concealing a mistake is worse than the mistake.
When Luxembourg and Italy are both in the case
A Luxembourg case often has an Italian side that was never mentioned to the people around the arrested person: a former address, a company, a bank account, an earlier investigation. Authorities exchange information faster than people assume, so telling your lawyer everything from the start avoids surprises at the hearing.
Documents are the first practical difficulty. Anything issued in Italy, such as a residence certificate, a company record, a court paper or a medical file, will probably need translating into the language of the proceedings, and some will need a formal certificate before a court accepts them. Luxembourg uses several languages, so ask early which one applies and whether an interpreter has been assigned. Ask relatives to find originals now, because translation and certification take longer than a hearing allows.
Time and post matter. Offices in the countries keep similar hours, but a request made late in the day is rarely dealt with until the next, and weekends and public holidays stop everything. Post between the countries is too slow for custody matters, so scans go at once and originals follow.
Defenders must speak to each other. The Luxembourg lawyer knows the prosecutor, the investigating judge and the procedure; the Italian lawyer knows the Italian file and can say whether an Italian measure exists. They should agree on one account of the facts and divide the work. The consulate can confirm detention, check conditions and pass messages, but it does not defend you and does not pay for a lawyer.
How the studio takes instructions on a Luxembourg arrest
Contact the studio by telephone or email using the details on this page. The Rome, Milan and Naples offices take the same calls, and conversations can be held in Italian or English. Say who is detained, where, when, what papers exist and whether an Italian measure is involved. If you cannot say, send photographs and we will read them and explain what they are.
The studio does not replace the Luxembourg defender. A person held in Luxembourg needs a lawyer who can appear before the local authorities, and the studio works with correspondents there. Our part is to explain to the family and the person held what is happening, to establish whether an Italian warrant or proceeding exists, to coordinate with the Luxembourg defender, to prepare documents of ties that can be translated, and to handle the Italian side of the case.
The appointment is made in writing, signed by the person concerned or, where that is impossible, by a family member on their behalf, and fees are explained before work begins. The initial conversation is about facts and priorities, not reassurance, and we say plainly what depends on the court. Send documents as clear scans labelled by date, with a line saying what each is. We are reachable outside office hours for urgent developments, and we tell the family at each stage what has been done and what must happen next.
The vocabulary of a Luxembourg file
A short vocabulary recurs in these cases. Knowing it makes the papers less alarming.
- Police custody. The initial period during which the police may question and hold a suspect, limited to a maximum set by the law.
- Preliminary investigation. The early stage ordered by the State Prosecutor, in which the police act under the prosecutor's direction.
- State Prosecutor. The official who directs the preliminary investigation and decides how the case moves.
- Investigating judge. The judge appointed where the case requires it, who decides whether to charge and what measures apply.
- Pre-trial detention. Custody ordered by the investigating judge while the case goes on. It can be reviewed.
- Charge. The formal step by which the judge places a person under investigation for stated facts. It is not a finding of guilt.
- European Arrest Warrant. A request between European countries to surrender a person for prosecution or a sentence, which follows a different track from an ordinary Luxembourg arrest.
If a word on your papers is not here, photograph it and ask. A guess from a similar word in another language can mislead.
Keep a short glossary of your own as the papers arrive, with the word, the date on which you met it and the explanation your lawyer gave. Relatives who read the documents later, and any interpreter who is brought in, will then use the same words that you do, and nothing will be lost between languages.
About the lawyer
Criminal defence is the whole of this practice. Avv. Massimo Romano is enrolled with the Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli and pleads before the Court of Cassation; the work that reaches him concerns Italian criminal procedure, extradition, European arrest warrants, and cases where an Italian citizen is held by a foreign authority. He takes instructions directly. The first contact is short and factual: what the charge is said to be, where the person is, what has already been signed or handed over. Nothing is promised at that stage, because the file has usually not been read. What follows the call is practical, a list of documents to collect, contact with the authority or with local counsel abroad, and a plan for the next hearing or request. Where relatives do not speak Italian, the conversation continues in their own language, and written updates are sent in that language as well, so nobody relies on second-hand translation.
Ring the office directly, or write on WhatsApp if calling is difficult. Keep beside you the summons or the record of the search, and the name of any lawyer already acting.
Avv. Massimo Romano — criminal defence lawyer, admitted to the Italian Court of Cassation
Iscritto all'Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553 | Patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015
Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138
+39 335 669 3954 · WhatsApp
