Financial crime in Italy: what a foreign company faces

Features of Italian practice surprise foreign companies more than any particular charge. The company itself is prosecuted alongside the individuals, under a liability regime of its own with its own penalties, and it is judged on its organisation rather than simply on what a manager did. Assets are also frozen at the investigation stage, long before any judgment, in an amount corresponding to the profit alleged, and for a trading business that freeze is usually the real emergency.
What follows from this is that the defence of the entity is different in kind from the defence of the individual. It turns on whether an organisational model capable of preventing offences of that type had been adopted and actually implemented, and whether a supervisory body was genuinely functioning. Management therefore has to work on documents and governance at the same time as the individuals answer the accusation against them.
Avv. Massimo Romano — Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553, patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015 — Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138 — +39 335 669 3954
In brief
- The liability of the entity arises for offences committed in its interest or to its advantage by people in senior positions or by those under their direction.
- The regime applies to foreign companies operating in Italy, and it is not vicarious, because the company is assessed on its own organisation and supervision.
- Penalties against the entity include financial sanctions and, in grave cases, measures that suspend the activity itself, which can matter more than any sentence on an individual.
- Laundering and self-laundering sit among the predicate offences, which is how an accounting or tax matter turns into proceedings against the company.
- Self-laundering requires that the reinvestment concretely obstruct identification of the criminal origin, so a traceable transfer into an account in the person's own name does not meet it.
- Preventive seizure during the investigation can reach accounts, shareholdings and property, and it is calculated on the profit alleged rather than on what has been proved.
- Searches of business premises involve copying digital material, an operation that cannot be repeated identically, so the defence must be given notice and may appoint its own expert.
- A search authorised for a particular matter does not permit the exploration of everything the company holds, and the scope of what was taken is open to challenge.
The company is a defendant
Legislative Decree 231/2001 created a liability of the entity itself for offences committed in its interest or to its advantage by people in senior positions or under their direction. It applies to foreign companies operating in Italy, and it is not vicarious: the entity is judged on its own organisation.
The defence is therefore different in kind from the individual's. It is not about what happened but about whether the company had adopted and effectively implemented an organisational model capable of preventing offences of that type, and whether a supervisory body was actually functioning. Penalties include financial sanctions calculated in units and, in serious cases, measures that suspend the activity itself.
Money laundering and self-laundering are among the predicate offences, which is how a tax or accounting matter turns into proceedings against the entity.
The offences that recur
| Area | What is typically charged | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Tax | Fraudulent or untrue returns, unpaid VAT, false invoicing | Legislative Decree 74/2000 |
| Insolvency | Fraudulent bankruptcy where assets were removed | Business Crisis and Insolvency Code |
| Corporate | False corporate communications, unlawful capital operations | Civil Code, corporate offences |
| Laundering | Handling, laundering, self-laundering of proceeds | Art. 648, 648-bis, 648-ter.1 Criminal Code |
| Fraud | Fraud, aggravated fraud against the State or the EU | Art. 640 and 640-bis |
| Entity liability | Proceedings against the company itself | Legislative Decree 231/2001 |
Self-laundering deserves a note of its own. Since 2014 the person who commits the predicate offence can also be prosecuted for reinvesting the proceeds, and the two charges are routinely brought together. The defence turns on a single word in the provision: the reinvestment must concretely obstruct identification of the criminal origin. A traceable transfer into an account in your own name does not.
Seizure is the emergency
A preventive seizure can be ordered during the investigation and can reach accounts, shares, property and receivables — including by equivalent, meaning assets unconnected to the alleged offence up to the value of the supposed profit. For an operating business this stops everything long before any court has decided anything.
The deadline is ten days from execution to apply for review before a court. Companies routinely spend those ten days deciding which firm to instruct, and then discover the remedy has gone.
- Establish exactly what has been seized, and on what legal basis.
- Check how the alleged profit was calculated: it is very often overstated, and it sets the ceiling of the seizure.
- Apply for release of what is needed for the business to continue operating.
- Keep the company's defence and the individuals' defences distinct: their interests are not identical.
Proceedings against the individual and against the company run side by side but are not the same case, and the table compares them where the difference matters.
| Feature | Case against the individual | Case against the company |
|---|---|---|
| What is examined | What the person did, knew and intended. | How the company was organised and supervised. |
| What the defence turns on | The account of events and the evidence of participation. | The organisational model, its implementation and the supervisory body. |
| What is at stake | Personal liberty, restrictions and professional disqualification. | Financial sanctions and measures affecting the activity itself. |
| Who speaks for the defence | The individual's own lawyer. | A separate defence for the entity, since the interests can diverge. |
| Effect of the seizure | It reaches personal accounts and property. | It reaches corporate accounts, shareholdings and trading assets. |
Searches and the tax police
Investigations in this area usually begin with a search of company premises and the seizure of servers, devices and accounting records. Copying digital material is a technical operation that cannot be repeated identically, which means the defence must be given notice and may appoint its own expert.
A tax audit is not a criminal proceeding, but it feeds one: findings pass to the prosecutor once thresholds are crossed. The two run in parallel with different rules on what can be used, and treating them as one process is a common and expensive mistake.
Frequently asked questions
Can a foreign company be prosecuted in Italy?
Yes. Legislative Decree 231/2001 provides for liability of the entity itself for offences committed in its interest, and it applies to foreign companies operating in Italy.
Can they freeze assets before any trial?
Yes. Preventive seizure is ordered during the investigation and can extend by equivalent to assets unconnected with the alleged offence, up to the value of the supposed profit.
How long do I have to challenge a seizure?
Ten days from execution, before the review court. It is the shortest and most frequently missed deadline in this area.
What is self-laundering?
Reinvesting the proceeds of your own offence in economic or financial activity in a way that concretely obstructs identification of their criminal origin. A traceable transfer to your own account normally does not.
If assets have been frozen
The ten-day clock starts on execution, not on the day the board meets. First contact is free and covered by professional privilege.
Who ends up reading about financial crime investigations
Business people do not usually expect a criminal file, and when a file arrives it is typically through an unexpected event rather than a slow build-up. The following situations are the most common among foreign companies and their owners.
A company's Italian branch, subsidiary or sales agent receives a visit from the tax police. Officers in uniform arrive during working hours, ask for a manager, and begin copying files and taking devices. The staff call head office, which is in another country, and nobody knows what authority the officers have or how to answer.
A foreign owner opens a letter from a bank saying that an Italian account or a property has been frozen under an order the owner has never seen. Payments to suppliers are bouncing, and salary cannot be paid.
A director or an adviser has been told that a supplier or client has been named in a fraud investigation, and that the company may be treated as a beneficiary of the conduct, a receiver of the proceeds, or an entity whose organisation failed to prevent an offence.
A trader, a platform operator or a small exporter has been accused of deceiving customers, or of dealing in goods or money of doubtful origin, on the basis of a complaint from a customer or a notice from a bank.
An individual who was formerly a signatory of a company, and who has since moved away, learns that his or her name is in a file.
All of them need an early, orderly picture of what has been seized, who is accused, and what deadlines are running.
A freeze on assets is attacked on specific grounds, and the table sets out what each ground requires and who decides it.
| Ground of challenge | What it requires | Who decides |
|---|---|---|
| The offence alleged is not made out | Showing that the material does not support the accusation relied on. | The review panel examining the measure. |
| The amount frozen exceeds the alleged profit | An accounting reconstruction of what the conduct could have produced. | The review panel, usually on expert material. |
| The assets do not belong to the person accused | Title documents and corporate records showing ownership elsewhere. | The panel, with the third party able to intervene. |
| The link between the assets and the offence is missing | Tracing the funds or property to a lawful and documented source. | The panel, and on appeal the higher court. |
| The measure prevents the business from operating | Showing the practical effect and proposing a narrower measure. | The judge who ordered it, on an application to vary. |
How a freeze, a search or an accusation reaches daily business
The effect on operations is often greater than any penalty that might follow, because a business depends on cash and on confidence.
Cash and payments. A freeze of accounts can stop payroll, supplier payments and tax payments. Staff and suppliers may withdraw their trust immediately. Ask the lawyer straight away how to apply for the release of sums needed for wages and essential costs.
Devices and records. Seized computers, servers and phones take the business's memory away. Without copies, invoices, contracts and customer data may be unavailable for months. Ask what can be copied, what can be returned, and how to keep operating.
Banks and partners. Banks may close accounts or refuse new facilities. Partners may suspend contracts. Insurers may deny claims. Customers may ask for reassurance in writing.
Licences and public work. Authorisations, certifications and the right to take part in public contracts can be put at risk by the existence of an investigation.
Staff. Employees who were present during a search may be questioned. They need to know their rights, and the company needs a clear instruction on how to behave.
The owner's private life. Travel, residence and personal accounts may be affected where the owner is a suspect.
Reputation. Press reports and online rumours reach clients quickly, and a prepared statement helps.
Decisions for management when assets are at risk
Managers and owners face decisions in the opening hours that determine whether the business stays afloat. Each has a price.
Cooperate with the officers on the spot, or insist on waiting for a lawyer. Staff should be polite and should not obstruct, but they should not volunteer explanations or hand over passwords without advice. The price of resistance is a charge of obstruction; the price of helpful talk is statements that create new problems. The balance is to allow the search to be carried out, to ask for a copy of the order, and to call a lawyer.
Name a spokesperson, or let every manager answer. A named person should speak for the company to officers, banks and the press. Others should refer questions to that person.
Move money to keep the business alive, or leave everything as it is. Transfers made after a freeze or a search can look like an attempt to hide assets and can create a new offence. Seek advice before any extraordinary payment.
Dismiss or suspend a person under suspicion, or wait. Acting too quickly can look like an admission, and acting too slowly can look like tolerance. The company's own internal rules matter here.
Disclose to banks and auditors now, or later. Contracts often require prompt notice. The lawyer should help to draft what is said.
Papers and data to secure for the company's defence
A company's defence in these files rests on showing how it was organised and what actually happened. The material is usually in the business's own records.
- The order or notice and any minutes of the search, photographed in full. Note the time officers arrived and left, and what was taken.
- An inventory of seized items, and of what remains. This tells you which records you still have.
- Corporate documents: registration papers, statutes, shareholder lists, minutes and powers of attorney, showing who may bind the company.
- Organisation charts, job descriptions and internal procedures, showing how responsibility was divided and checked. The company's own organisation is judged.
- Policies and training records on compliance, anti-fraud and money handling, with dates of adoption and evidence of use.
- Contracts, invoices and payment records for the transactions under investigation, with proof of delivery of goods or services.
- Bank statements and ledgers for the relevant periods, including foreign accounts.
- Emails and messages relating to the transactions, preserved by instruction to the IT team, with deletion routines suspended.
- A list of the people involved, with roles, and of external advisers.
Ask the IT department to stop any automatic deletion immediately, and to document what was backed up before the search.
Questions for the lawyer when a company is under investigation
These questions are aimed at the issues that matter most in business cases, and they are rarely raised by managers new to the system.
- Is the company itself a suspect, or only individuals, and how does the file describe the company's role?
- Which offence is alleged, and what profit or amount does the prosecution attribute to it?
- On what basis were assets frozen, in what amount, and to which accounts or properties does the freeze apply?
- How do we ask for release of the sums needed for salaries and essential costs, and what proof is required?
- What should we tell our bank, auditors, insurers and key clients, and who approves the wording?
- Did the company have internal procedures that the prosecution will examine, and how can we show them?
- Should the company and the individual managers have separate lawyers, and where might their interests diverge?
- How do we handle the seized devices, and can copies be made or returned?
- If we cooperate, what are the risks and benefits, and in what form should cooperation be given?
Prepare the questions in writing and put them to the lawyer in order of urgency. Money and payroll normally take priority.
Ask the lawyer also what the company may say to staff and to customers in writing, and whether a short holding statement should be prepared. Managers who improvise explanations under pressure often say more than they intend, and the words are kept.
A search of company premises produces most of the evidence in these files, and the table lists what to secure, why it matters and who must be told.
| Material | Why it matters | Who must be involved |
|---|---|---|
| Copies of digital material taken | The copying cannot be repeated identically, so the method has to be recorded. | The defence lawyer and an expert appointed by the company. |
| The authorisation for the search | It defines the matter investigated and therefore the permitted scope. | The defence, which examines what was taken against that scope. |
| The organisational model and its records | They are the substance of the entity's defence. | Management, the supervisory body and the company's own lawyer. |
| Accounting records and invoicing files | They support or undermine the reconstruction of the alleged profit. | The accountant, with the defence expert. |
| Correspondence with advisers | It shows what advice was sought and what was disclosed. | The defence, since protected material must be identified at once. |
| The inventory signed on the day | It is the record of what actually left the premises. | Whoever was present, who should keep a copy. |
Foreign parent companies, foreign accounts and foreign managers
When the company is a foreign group, or when money has passed through other countries, the case acquires a cross-border character that affects everything from evidence to tone.
Head office is not in Italy, and decisions have to be made by people who are not on the spot. Give the Italian staff clear instructions in their own language, appoint a person with authority to deal with the lawyer, and agree how information flows to the group. Messages between head office and the Italian unit are potentially evidence, so write carefully.
Documents are in other languages and need official translation to be used. Accounting records follow different standards and may need explanation. A lawyer or an accountant in the home country can help, but should coordinate with the Italian lawyer, because statements made in a given place reach the other.
Freezes can affect accounts in other countries through requests between authorities. The group should check with its banks abroad and warn the foreign lawyers.
Time zones and holidays slow communication. Set fixed calls and a shared secure channel for documents.
Managers who live abroad should ask before travelling to Italy, because their position in the file determines whether they face any restriction.
The embassy or consulate may help in cases of arrest, but it does not intervene in a company's affairs.
How the firm organises company cases
These cases are handled as projects with several tracks: the company, the individual managers, the seized assets and the communications with banks and authorities. The firm's method follows that division.
Contact begins by email at avvmassimoromano@gmail.com or by the number on the contact page. Send the order, the inventory of items taken, and the name of the person who will act for the company. The initial call identifies what is frozen, what payments are due, and which dates are running. The lawyer will tell you which applications must be made immediately, usually those for the release of funds, and which can follow.
The firm advises on who should be a client. Where the interests of the company and of an individual manager might diverge, separate lawyers are recommended, and the firm explains why. This protects everyone and avoids conflicts at a later stage.
The team has offices in Rome, Milan and Naples, which helps where the investigating offices and the company's operations are in different cities. Meetings take place in person or by video, and the conversation with you is in English. Italian documents are translated and explained before anything is signed.
With group companies abroad, the firm works with local counsel and with the group's own legal department, agreeing a consistent line on communications. Urgent situations, such as a search under way, can be reported at any hour.
What management and staff should not do during and after a search
The conduct of the company in the hours of a search and in the weeks after is read as evidence of how it is run. These are the most damaging mistakes.
- Do not obstruct the officers or refuse access, but do ask for the order and call the lawyer. Resistance leads to force and to charges.
- Do not delete, move or alter files, before or after the search. Automatic clean-up routines should be suspended.
- Do not instruct staff on what to say. Coaching witnesses can become obstruction. Tell them they may ask for a lawyer.
- Do not shift money between accounts or companies to protect it. It looks like concealment and can create an offence.
- Do not give officers passwords or sign statements without advice.
- Do not discuss the case in group chats or open email threads. They can be seized and read.
- Do not make public statements without the lawyer's approval. What is said to the press can be quoted in the file.
- Do not retaliate against the person who raised the problem. This can create a separate difficulty.
Circulate a short internal instruction to all staff with these points, approved by the lawyer. A clear instruction avoids many errors.
Terms in financial-crime papers and what they mean for the company
Italian papers on financial crime use technical words, and a few of them are central to how the company is treated. The following appear on this page and in the Italian sources on the subject.
- Truffa: fraud by deceit, where a person is induced into error and suffers a loss while another gains.
- Ricettazione: receiving stolen or illicitly obtained goods or money, with knowledge of their origin.
- Sequestro preventivo: preventive seizure of assets during the investigation, before any judgment.
- Profitto: the profit attributed to the offence, which sets the size of the freeze.
- Ente: the entity, meaning the company, which can be prosecuted under its own liability regime.
- Modello organizzativo: the organisational model of procedures and controls through which a company can show that it took steps to prevent offences.
- Perquisizione: a search of premises, devices or documents, carried out under an order.
- Guardia di Finanza: the tax and financial police, who often conduct searches in business cases.
- Persona sottoposta alle indagini: a person under investigation, whether an individual or a manager.
If a word on your papers does not appear here, photograph the page and send it to the lawyer. Technical accounting and legal terms are often mistranslated.
Keep a glossary for the finance team, since accountants and bankers will meet the same words in letters from banks and in requests from auditors. A shared vocabulary within the company prevents the confusion that arises when different people describe the same event in different terms.
About the lawyer
Most people reach this office in the middle of something they did not plan for: an arrest in another country, a search at dawn, a summons that arrived while they were away from Italy. The first conversation is with Avv. Massimo Romano himself, not with a secretary who takes a message. He is a criminal defence lawyer admitted to plead before the Italian Court of Cassation, and his work has long centred on Italian criminal procedure, European arrest warrants and extradition. On that first call he asks what documents exist, who has seen the person detained, and which authority is involved. No assessment is given before the papers have been read. Afterwards he sets out, in writing, what can be done from Italy and what has to be done where the person is held. Relatives who do not speak Italian are not left translating for themselves: the office speaks with the family in English, by telephone and in writing.
Call the office, or write on WhatsApp if that is easier from abroad. Have to hand the full name of the person involved, the city and country where they are held, and any document already received, even as a photograph.
Avv. Massimo Romano — criminal defence lawyer, admitted to the Italian Court of Cassation
Iscritto all'Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553 | Patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015
Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138
+39 335 669 3954 · WhatsApp
