Rome — Via Avicenna 97 · Milan · Naples avvmassimoromano@gmail.com
Advice 24/7+39 335 669 3954
Emergency and arrest

How long pre-trial detention can last in Italy

by Massimo Romano4 min readupdated 2026-08-05
Empty visiting room
Direct answer

Italian custody before judgment is governed by separate sets of limits running at the same time: a term attached to the stage the proceedings have reached, and an overall ceiling for the case as a whole. The ceiling is fixed by reference to the maximum sentence the offence carries, and it operates independently of the stage terms, which is why it is the limit that matters in long proceedings.

Exceeding either limit means the measure loses effect and the person must be released, but nothing happens automatically: it has to be raised, and it has to be calculated. That calculation is where releases are found, because the terms stop running in the situations the code lists, every suspension has to be ordered and reasoned, and whether it was ordered and whether it covered the period claimed are rarely checked until a lawyer checks them.

Avv. Massimo Romano — Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553, patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015 — Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138 — +39 335 669 3954

In brief

  • The stage term limits how long custody may last during the investigation, until the judgment at trial, until the judgment on appeal and until the judgment becomes final.
  • Each of those terms is fixed by reference to the sentence the offence carries, so a reclassification of the charge changes the arithmetic entirely.
  • The overall ceiling applies to the whole proceedings whatever happens inside them, and it is calculated from the maximum sentence for the offence as charged.
  • Suspension is where these calculations go wrong, and it explains how a person can be held far longer than the headline limit suggests.
  • The code allows the terms to stop running during certain adjournments, during periods the defence has asked for, and in complex proceedings with many accused.
  • Every suspension has to be ordered and reasoned, so checking whether it was and whether it covered the period claimed is productive work rather than a formality.
  • The calculation starts from the day the measure was enforced rather than from the arrest where the dates differ, and the transition between stages is contested more often than it is verified.
  • Release for expiry does not end the exposure, because a fresh measure remains possible where new grounds arise, and aggravating circumstances that raise the bracket raise the terms with it.

Two clocks, not one

The first clock is the phase term. Custody may last only so long during the investigation, so long until the first-instance judgment, so long until the appeal judgment, and so long until the judgment becomes final. Each of those is fixed by reference to the sentence the offence carries.

The second is the overall ceiling for the entire proceedings, whatever happens within it. It is the limit that matters in long cases, and it operates independently of the phase terms.

Element · Rule · Provision
ElementRuleProvision
Phase termsFixed for each stage, by reference to the penaltyArt. 303 c.p.p.
Overall ceilingTwo, four or six years according to the maximum sentenceArt. 303(4) c.p.p.
SuspensionTerms stop running in the situations the code listsArt. 304 c.p.p.
ExtensionPossible on the prosecutor's application, within limitsArt. 305 c.p.p.
Effect of expiryThe measure loses effect and the person is releasedArt. 306 c.p.p.
After release for expiryA new measure is possible only on new groundsArt. 307 c.p.p.

Why the clock stops

Suspension is where these calculations go wrong, and it is the reason a person can be in custody far longer than the headline figure suggests. The code allows the terms to stop running during certain adjournments, during periods when the defence has asked for time, and in complex proceedings with many defendants.

Each suspension has to be ordered and reasoned. Checking whether it was, and whether it covered the period claimed, is exactly the kind of calculation nobody does until a lawyer does it — and it produces releases.

Making the calculation

  • Start from the day the measure was enforced, not from the arrest if they differ.
  • Identify the offence as currently charged: a reclassification changes the terms.
  • Check every suspension and whether it was ordered with reasons.
  • Check whether the aggravating circumstances that raise the bracket really apply, because they raise the terms too.
  • Watch the transition between stages: a new phase term begins, and the moment it does is contested more often than it is checked.

The limits on custody work on different levels, and the table compares them because a case can be inside one and outside the other.

LimitWhat it measuresWhy it matters
Term for the stage reachedHow long custody may last within the stage the case is in.A new term begins at each transition, and that moment is often disputed.
Overall ceiling for the proceedingsThe total period of custody permitted across the whole case.It is the limit that bites in long and complex proceedings.
Suspension of the termsPeriods in which the clock stops for reasons the code lists.It is the main reason a detention lasts longer than expected.
Extension granted on applicationA lengthening of a term, within the limits the code sets.It must be applied for and reasoned, so it can be attacked.
Effect of expiryThe measure loses effect and release follows.It is not applied on its own, so it has to be raised.

What happens on expiry

The measure loses effect and the person must be released. It is not an acquittal and the proceedings continue; a fresh measure can be applied only where new grounds emerge, not on the same material.

Separately from the terms, a measure can be attacked at any time on the merits: by review within ten days of enforcement, and afterwards by application to revoke or replace it. Both are in the guide on precautionary measures.

Frequently asked questions

Is there a maximum period of pre-trial detention in Italy?

Yes. Terms apply to each stage and an overall ceiling of two, four or six years applies to the whole case, according to the maximum sentence.

Why has someone been held longer than that?

Because the terms can be suspended in the situations the code lists. Each suspension must be ordered and reasoned, and whether it was is worth checking.

What happens when the term expires?

The measure loses effect and the person is released. The proceedings continue, and a new measure is possible only on new grounds.

Does the calculation change if the charge changes?

Yes. The terms are tied to the penalty for the offence as charged, so a reclassification or a dropped aggravating circumstance changes them.

If someone has been in custody a long time

The calculation is arithmetic on the file, and it is worth doing rather than assuming. First contact is free and covered by professional privilege.

Decisions for a family when custody drags on

Long detention before trial creates a particular kind of pressure: the case seems to be going nowhere, and every option feels either too slow or too risky. Several choices come up repeatedly, and each has a price that is worth seeing in advance.

  • Asking the lawyer to calculate both clocks now. The cost is almost nothing, and it tells you the dates on which each limit falls. Waiting means that an expiry which passed unnoticed is not corrected by itself, because the limit has to be raised by an application before anything happens.
  • Applying for a lighter measure. House arrest, reporting duties or a residence requirement are alternatives to prison. For a foreign national the difficulty is usually practical: the court wants a stable address in Italy, a person who will host, and proof that the measure can be monitored. If those cannot be offered, the application may fail and the refusal then sits in the file.
  • Challenging the grounds for custody. A review of the measure goes to the strength of the evidence and the need for custody. It is a different argument from the clock and can run alongside it.
  • Changing lawyer. Sometimes it is right. The price is time spent catching up, so make the change early or not at all.
  • Waiting for the next hearing. Sometimes the lawyer advises it. Ask what the hearing can change and whether the clock keeps running meanwhile.

Whichever route is chosen, ask for the reasoning in writing, so that the family can read it later without relying on memory.

The calculation is a sequence of checks rather than a single sum, and the table sets each check against what it can produce.

CheckWhat it can produce
The date the measure was actually enforcedA different starting point from the arrest, which shifts every term.
The offence as currently chargedA shorter term where the classification has changed since the outset.
Each suspension, and whether it was reasonedPeriods that have to be counted back into the detention.
Whether the aggravating circumstances really applyLower terms, since those circumstances raise them.
The moment a new stage beganA term already expired, where the transition was placed incorrectly.
Custody served in another country for the same casePeriods that count towards the Italian terms.

Who reads about the length of pre-trial custody

The most common reader is a relative of a person who has been held for many months and has begun to hear numbers from other prisoners or from visitors: a limit expressed in years here, a different limit there, a story about a man who was released when the time ran out. The family wants to know what is true, which limit applies to their case and why nobody has mentioned it.

Another reader is the detainee, writing from a cell through a relative or a volunteer, who has lost track of the stage reached by the case. Hearings have been postponed, a judgment has been announced and then delayed, and the person cannot tell whether the time in custody is within the law. A foreign national without family in Italy often falls into this group, because nobody outside is counting.

A further group is made up of employers, partners and friends who have been asked for help and do not understand the vocabulary. They need to know that Italian law sets limits, that the limits are specific to each stage, and that they do not apply on their own motion. Release on expiry has to be requested by the defence, with the dates calculated and the grounds stated. This page explains the shape of that calculation so that you can ask the right questions of the lawyer who has the file.

What months in custody do to a household and a livelihood

The effects accumulate quietly. Rent, utilities and loans keep falling due, and the earner is not there. A family that depended on the earner's income must decide which bills to leave unpaid, whether to borrow and how to explain the situation to a landlord. Children miss a parent and ask questions that cannot be answered honestly in a visiting room. A spouse becomes the intermediary for everything: lawyers, prison administration, money for the detainee's account, letters and legal papers.

For a foreign national the pressure has other layers. A residence permit or a work visa may expire while the person is held, and a lapse can create problems at release. Employers do not wait; a job that was a lifeline disappears in the opening weeks, and a business with no manager can fail. Documents are left in a flat or a car, and bank cards are cancelled. Health becomes an issue. Medication, dental care and the effects of confinement all matter more as time passes.

Visits are expensive and tiring. Relatives who live abroad have to book flights without knowing whether a visit will be authorised on the day. Telephone calls are limited and monitored, so conversations that should be private are not. Planning for the practical side as early as possible, with a trusted person responsible for each task, makes the legal side easier to manage.

Things that make a long detention worse

These mistakes are common, and each has a reason.

  • Do not assume the law releases a person automatically. The limit is a right that must be invoked. A clock that has run out and has not been raised is of no use.
  • Do not rely on numbers heard in prison. Limits depend on the offence, the stage and the events that pause the clock. A figure that was right for another person is usually wrong for yours.
  • Do not press the lawyer to file something unprepared. A weak application that is refused makes the next application harder to argue.
  • Do not pay strangers who promise a release. Intermediaries who say they know a judge or a clerk are a recurring fraud.
  • Do not discuss the case on prison telephones. Calls are recorded and may be read in the file.
  • Do not refuse to attend hearings or sign waivers without advice. A refusal can affect how the clock is counted and how the court sees the person.
  • Do not write to the judge or prosecutor directly. Letters that bypass the lawyer can contradict the defence.
  • Do not treat release as permission to leave Italy. A person freed on expiry may still be bound by conditions, and the case continues.

Dates and documents to assemble for the calculation

Everything in this subject turns on dates. A lawyer can calculate quickly if the following are in hand.

  • The order that imposed custody, with the date on which it was carried out and the date of the arrest if different.
  • Every later decision about the measure: confirmations, replacements, reviews, extensions, and the reasons given.
  • A list of the stages passed so far, each with its date: investigation, preliminary hearing, trial, appeal, and any decision that ended a stage.
  • The calendar of hearings, noting which were postponed, by whom the postponement was requested and the reason recorded.
  • The offence as charged, with any change in the description made since the arrest, because the limits follow the sentence that the offence carries.
  • Any earlier period in custody for the same facts, in Italy or abroad, with certificates in the original language and a translation.
  • The name of the institution where the person is held, the detainee registration number and the date of each transfer.
  • Material that supports a lighter measure: proof of an address, an offer of hospitality, a job offer, family ties, a passport held by the lawyer.

Do not guess dates. If a relative is unsure, say so, and let the lawyer retrieve them from the file. Write a simple calendar sheet, with a line for each event and the source of the date beside it, which saves a great deal of time in the opening call.

Families can do specific things while a detention runs long, and the table compares what each actor is able to contribute.

WhoWhat they can contribute
The defence lawyerThe calculation of the terms, the attack on each suspension and the application for release.
The familyDates, documents, an address and an offer of supervision that supports a lesser measure.
The employerWritten confirmation of a job held open, which weighs on any application to vary.
Medical practitionersDocumentation of conditions that bear on compatibility with custody.
The consulateConfirmation of identity and status, within the limits of its own role.
The courtThe decision on expiry, on variation and on any fresh measure proposed.

When the person was held in another country before or during the case

Time spent in custody abroad for the same facts creates a question: is it recorded and does it count? The answer depends on the facts and on the documents that survive. Obtain certificates from the foreign prison or court showing the dates of arrest, release and any transfer, and have them translated by a translator whose work an Italian office will accept. Without paper, the period tends to disappear from the calculation.

Where a person was surrendered to Italy under a European arrest warrant, the date of surrender and the date of the original arrest are both relevant, and the lawyer in the other country can supply the records. Ask early. Foreign registries respond slowly, and a certificate that arrives after a hearing helps less.

A relative in another country faces practical hurdles as well: the time difference for calls to the lawyer, the cost of couriering original papers, the difficulty of visiting. The consulate of the person's own country can confirm that he is held, pass messages and give lists of interpreters. It cannot calculate the clock or ask for release. If the person might be released on conditions that prevent leaving Italy, think through where he would live and how the family could support him there, because a refusal of a lighter measure often comes from a lack of an address, not from any doubt about the law.

How the firm works out where the clock stands

Send the custody order and every decision you hold by email or WhatsApp. The address is avvmassimoromano@gmail.com and the telephone number is on this page. A photograph of each page is enough to start. If the family has only a few papers, the lawyer asks for the rest from the file. If scanning is difficult, a photograph taken in good light is enough, and the lawyer will say which pages are unreadable.

The opening call is a conversation about dates. The lawyer asks when the arrest happened, when the measure was carried out, how many hearings took place, how many were postponed and why. From that conversation the lawyer builds a timeline and identifies the stage the case is in. The call ends with a request for authority to read the file, and a list of what the family should collect.

The calculation is done by the lawyer, in writing, and explained in English. If the limit is close, the lawyer prepares an application and files it; if it is distant, the lawyer sets a date for review and keeps the family informed. Offices in Rome, Milan and Naples let the lawyer attend hearings wherever the case sits. The engagement is agreed in writing before work begins, and updates follow each step, including when nothing has changed.

Questions to ask about the clock itself

These questions are specific to the length of custody. They are the ones that families rarely think to put.

  • Which stage is the case in today, and what is the limit for that stage in my relative's situation?
  • Which overall ceiling applies, and what in the charge determines it?
  • On what date does each limit fall, and who has calculated it?
  • Which postponements paused the clock, and were they requested by the defence or by somebody else?
  • If the charge is reclassified, does the calculation change?
  • What exactly must be filed to raise an expiry, and how fast is a decision normally made?
  • If a limit has been missed, what happens next: release, a lighter measure, a new order?
  • Does time in custody abroad count, and what do you need from the other country?
  • What are the alternatives if the clock is not close, and what do they cost?
  • If the person is moved to another institution, does that affect any date or the court that decides?
  • Who tells us when a hearing has been postponed, and can we be given the reason in writing?
  • Would a request for a lighter measure weaken the argument about the clock, or can both be pursued together?

Ask for the answers to be set out in a short note that you can keep.

Terms you will see on custody papers

The vocabulary comes from Italian procedure and often reaches families in loose translation.

  • Custodia cautelare — pre-trial custody, imposed before any conviction to protect the proceedings or the public.
  • Misure cautelari personali — the family of personal precautionary measures, from reporting duties to prison.
  • Ordinanza di custodia cautelare — the order imposing custody. Its date is the starting point for the calculation.
  • Gravi indizi di colpevolezza — the serious indications of guilt that must exist before a measure can be ordered.
  • Esigenze cautelari — the precautionary needs, such as a risk of flight or of repeating the offence, that justify custody.
  • Termini di fase — the time limits for each stage of the proceedings.
  • Tribunale del riesame — the review court that examines whether a measure was properly ordered.
  • Udienza preliminare — the preliminary hearing at which a judge decides whether the case goes to trial.

If another term appears on your papers, send it to the lawyer as written. A translation that sounds nearly right can hide a difference of stage. Italian orders also cite provisions in a shorthand that looks like a number and a letter. Do not try to decode it yourself; copy it exactly into your message, and the lawyer will say in plain words what it refers to and why it matters to the dates.

About the lawyer

A relative detained abroad changes the shape of a family's day: nobody knows who to call first, and the information that does arrive is fragmentary. Avv. Massimo Romano works on Italian criminal matters, European arrest warrants and the position of Italians arrested outside Italy, and he is admitted to plead before the Court of Cassation. The office works from Rome, Milan and Naples, which matters when papers have to be filed in one city while the family lives in another. Contact usually begins with a telephone call or a WhatsApp message describing, in plain terms, what happened. He reads whatever paperwork exists before giving an opinion; if something is missing, he says what to ask for and who to ask. After that first conversation the family receives a written account of the position and the steps that follow. Discussions with relatives are held in the language they use at home.

Telephone the office or send a WhatsApp message. Before you call, gather the document you received, the name of the authority written on it, and the file reference if one appears.

Avv. Massimo Romano — criminal defence lawyer, admitted to the Italian Court of Cassation
Iscritto all'Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553 | Patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015
Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138
+39 335 669 3954 · WhatsApp

Reachable 24 hours

Tell me what has happened

First contact is free and covered by professional privilege, at any hour including nights and holidays.

Bar of Naples, admission no. 14553 · Rome · Milan · Naples

WhatsAppCall now
Write on WhatsApp