Arrested in Copenhagen: 24 hours, and the preliminary hearing

Denmark works on a short fixed period. If a person has not been released within it, they must be brought before a court for the preliminary statutory hearing, where a judge chooses between release, custody, and extending the arrest in further blocks of the same length where the evidence is not yet sufficient to decide.
The extension mechanism is the point most people miss. That period is the limit before a judge, not the limit of detention: where the court cannot yet decide, the arrest continues in successive blocks, and each of those blocks is a further opportunity to put material before the judge rather than a dead interval. The grounds relied on are stated by the police, a lawyer and an interpreter are available as of right, and the same hearing structure applies where custody is sought to ensure availability for surrender on a European Arrest Warrant.
Avv. Massimo Romano — Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553, patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015 — Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138 — +39 335 669 3954
In brief
- The preliminary statutory hearing is where the decision is made, and the material placed before the judge at that moment determines whether detention begins at all.
- Extension in further blocks is not a failure of the system but part of it, and each block is a fresh opportunity to answer the grounds the police have stated.
- A lawyer and an interpreter are available as of right, and both should be asked for expressly rather than waited for.
- Danish drug enforcement is strict, and the tolerance once associated with a particular district has been dismantled, so assumptions based on its reputation are now a source of cases rather than a guide.
- Cycling offences that seem trivial elsewhere are enforced here, including riding under the influence, which surprises visitors who assume a bicycle is outside the rules on driving.
- Theft accusations in shops and around the stations are common, and they frequently rest on an identification or on store security footage held on a short retention cycle.
- The crossing to Sweden takes minutes, so a single evening can generate a case with ends in separate jurisdictions, each with its own procedure and its own lawyer.
- The concentration of corporate headquarters and shipping companies produces financial and corporate proceedings in which the company and the individual are exposed on different bases.
The Danish clock
| Step | Rule | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Release or court | Within 24 hours of the arrest | The preliminary statutory hearing |
| The judge's options | Release, custody, or extension | Decided at that hearing |
| Extension | Up to three further periods of 24 hours | Where the evidence is not yet sufficient |
| Grounds | Risk of jeopardising the investigation, and others | Stated by the police |
| European Arrest Warrant | Custody to ensure availability for surrender | Same hearing structure |
| Lawyer | Right to one, and to an interpreter | Ask expressly |
The extension mechanism is the point people miss. Twenty-four hours is the limit before a judge, not the limit of detention: where the court cannot yet decide, the arrest continues in blocks, and each of those blocks is a further opportunity to put material before the judge.
What actually happens in Copenhagen
- Nightlife in the centre and Vesterbro: fights, public order, intoxication offences.
- Drugs. Denmark is strict, and the tolerance that once existed in Christiania has been dismantled — assumptions based on its reputation produce cases.
- Cycling, where offences that seem trivial elsewhere are enforced, including riding under the influence.
- Theft accusations in shops and around the stations.
- The airport and the Öresund crossing to Sweden: customs, cash and alert-based arrests.
- Financial and corporate proceedings, given the concentration of headquarters and shipping.
The Öresund point matters practically: crossing to Malmö takes minutes and puts you in a different jurisdiction, so a case can have two national ends within a single evening.
Where an Italian lawyer comes in
Only a lawyer admitted in Denmark can appear before its courts. The Italian side covers the rest: selecting and briefing that lawyer, explaining the position to the family in their own language, and handling anything with an Italian end — a parallel proceeding, a warrant issued by Italy, an alert in circulation. The model is in how a correspondent case is run.
The sequence from arrest to a decision on custody is defined, and so is what happens when the court cannot yet decide. The table sets it out.
| Step | What the rule provides | What it means in practice |
|---|---|---|
| Release or appearance before a court | Within the fixed period from the arrest | Preparation happens overnight, not over days |
| The preliminary statutory hearing | A judge considers the grounds stated by the police | The one occasion where material changes the outcome |
| The judge's options | Release, custody, or extension of the arrest | Custody is not the only outcome available |
| Extension | Further blocks of the same length | Each block is another chance to put material in |
| Surrender cases | Custody to ensure availability for surrender | The same hearing structure applies |
| Lawyer and interpreter | Available as of right | They must be asked for expressly |
Frequently asked questions
How long before I see a judge in Denmark?
Within twenty-four hours of the arrest, at a preliminary statutory hearing where a judge decides between release, custody and extension.
Can they hold me longer than 24 hours?
Yes, by extension: where the evidence is not yet sufficient to decide, the arrest can be extended for up to three further periods of twenty-four hours.
Is Christiania still tolerated?
No. Assumptions based on its old reputation produce cases: Denmark enforces drug law strictly.
Is cycling under the influence an offence?
Yes, and cycling offences generally are enforced here far more than visitors expect.
If this is happening now
First contact is free and covered by professional privilege, at any hour including nights and holidays.
What the arrest changes at home and at work
The most immediate change is a practical one: you are unreachable. A person held by the Danish police cannot answer a telephone, open an email or move money, and the people who depend on you will notice within hours. An employer expecting you at a meeting, a landlord awaiting a payment, a school that cannot reach a parent, all of them fill the silence with their own explanations.
For a traveller, the arrest breaks the journey. Flights, hotels and onward connections are lost, a rental car is left somewhere, and luggage, medication and a laptop may be in places you cannot reach. If you are in Denmark for work, a colleague may have to explain your absence without knowing what to say. Say as little as is true and as much as is needed: that you are delayed by a legal matter and a lawyer is dealing with it.
For a resident, there is a longer shadow. Employers can suspend staff pending the outcome. Banks and landlords sometimes react to a charge as if it were a finding. A professional licence, a security clearance or a position of trust can be affected even before a court has decided anything. Family members may need money at once, and a joint account or a signature that only you can give becomes a real difficulty.
Then there is the matter of your health and routine. Medication, dietary needs and anything you depend on every day have to be raised with the custody staff and with your lawyer early, in writing if possible. The arrest does not suspend any of these needs, and a request made late is harder to meet. Make a short list for the person who will speak for you, so that nothing important depends on memory.
Who arrives on this page after a call from Copenhagen
A relative has telephoned from a police station, or has not telephoned at all, and the family has only a few sentences: the name of a city, the word arrested, and perhaps a promise of more information later. You are reading this to learn what the next day looks like and who to call.
Another reader is the traveller himself or herself, released after a hearing or waiting for one, who has been told that a judge will decide between release, custody and extension and wants to understand what each of those words means before walking into the room. The proceedings are conducted in a language that may not be yours, with an interpreter whose quality you have no means to judge.
A further reader is someone who has been arrested in Denmark on a request from Italy, or who fears that an Italian warrant is behind the arrest. The European Arrest Warrant changes the route entirely, because the question is no longer only whether the Danish authorities can hold you but whether you can be sent to Italy, and by what procedure. People in this position often do not know whether they are being questioned about a Danish offence or an Italian one, and the difference governs everything that follows.
All of these readers need the same thing in the same order: to know what clock is running, who is entitled to speak for them, and what must not be said or signed in the meantime. This page is organised around those needs.
Several assumptions that visitors bring with them are wrong here, and each produces cases. The table compares the assumption with the position.
| Assumption | What visitors expect | The position in Denmark |
|---|---|---|
| Tolerance of soft drugs | A permissive district where nothing is enforced | Enforcement is strict and the tolerance has been dismantled |
| Cycling rules | Cycling offences are not real offences | They are enforced, including riding under the influence |
| Shop security | A dispute settled with the shop | A theft accusation passed to the police |
| Crossing to Sweden | The same jurisdiction either side | A separate country, with its own procedure |
| Intoxication | Treated as an explanation | Treated as an offence in its own right |
What to have in hand when someone speaks for you
Whoever is acting for you from outside needs paper and facts. Collect what you can without touching originals, and photograph rather than carry.
- Passport or identity card details, with a scan of the photo page, so that a lawyer can confirm who you are to the police and the court.
- The time and place of the arrest, with the name of the station or office if you know it. The clock runs from the moment of arrest, so the hour matters.
- Any paper the police gave you, in the original language, photographed whole. Do not rely on a verbal summary of it.
- The name of any interpreter or officer who spoke to you, and what was said about your rights.
- Whether you asked for a lawyer and when, and what you were told. This detail may matter later.
- Travel documents: tickets, hotel booking, rental agreement, the name of the company you came to see. They show purpose and ties.
- Details of Italian proceedings, if any exist: a summons, a prior investigation, a number or a name of an office. Whoever acts for you must know if Italy has an interest.
- Medical information and medication that custody staff must know about.
- Family and employer contacts, and who may speak to whom.
If something is missing, write that it is missing. A clear list of gaps lets a lawyer ask the right question on the first call.
Choices facing you in the next few hours
The initial choice is whether to answer questions before a lawyer is present. Police often present a conversation as routine. What you say is recorded, translated and held against what you later say. Waiting costs you the appearance of cooperation and may mean a longer wait at the station; answering costs you control over a statement that you cannot take back. If you decide to wait, say so plainly and calmly, in a single sentence, and do not argue the point.
The next choice is about the hearing before the judge. You can contest the grounds the police put forward, or you can accept a short period of custody to give the investigation time while your side is prepared. Contesting means a more demanding hearing and the risk that the judge, hearing arguments that were not prepared, extends the arrest. Accepting means you stay in custody longer than you might have. A local lawyer who has seen the file can tell you which is realistic; nobody else can.
A further choice concerns who speaks to the outside world. The embassy or consulate can be informed on request, and you can ask for a family member to be told. Telling too many people early produces confusion and rumours; telling nobody leaves people frightened. Name one person who will relay messages and give their details to the police and to your lawyer.
Lastly, decide how much of the case to share with the person who is looking after you at home. Keep the details of the allegation to the lawyers. Tell family the practical facts: where you are, that you have a defender and when the next step is due.
Behaviours that damage a defence
The following are the actions that most often make a difficult situation harder. The reasons matter as much as the rules.
- Do not sign any document you cannot read in a language you understand. A signature is read as acceptance.
- Do not explain yourself informally to cell mates, guards or acquaintances. Conversations are not confidential and may be reported.
- Do not use the telephone to discuss the case with relatives. Calls from custody may be monitored, and relatives may be questioned later.
- Do not post on social media or in group chats. A sentence meant to reassure friends becomes an exhibit.
- Do not delete messages, photographs or accounts on your phone or in the cloud. Removal reads as concealment.
- Do not contact witnesses or the person who made a complaint to apologise or settle. It may be taken as interference with the investigation, which is itself a ground for custody.
- Do not assume that a short interview means a short case. A relaxed tone from officers says nothing about what the prosecutor intends.
- Do not tell the court a story you cannot sustain. A change of account later is far more damaging than a measured silence now.
Each of these keeps open choices that would otherwise close within hours.
Cases involving visitors here arise from recognisable settings. The table sets each beside the point it turns on.
| Setting | Typical case | What decides it |
|---|---|---|
| Nightlife in the centre | Fights, public order and intoxication offences | Footage and independent witnesses |
| Drugs | Possession and supply allegations | Quantity, circumstances and the analysis |
| Cycling | Offences committed on a bicycle | The testing procedure and the officers' record |
| Shops and stations | Theft accusations | Store footage, while it still exists |
| The airport and the crossing to Sweden | Customs, cash and arrests on alerts | Whether a declaration obligation or an alert applied |
| Corporate and shipping sector | Financial and corporate proceedings | Contemporaneous documents and approvals |
Questions worth putting to a lawyer about Danish custody
These are the questions that people outside the profession do not think to ask, and the answers shape the whole first week.
- Which court will hear the preliminary hearing, and have you or a local colleague seen the file before it begins?
- What grounds are the police putting forward, and which of them can we realistically challenge?
- If the judge extends the arrest, how long can it be extended and what is the plan for the next hearing?
- Is there any Italian proceeding or warrant connected to this, and would it change how we handle the hearing?
- Who is the interpreter, how was that person chosen, and can we ask for another if the translation seems poor?
- What restrictions on contact, letters and visits might be imposed, and how do I challenge them?
- Who coordinates between the Danish defender and an Italian lawyer, and who instructs whom?
- What will happen to my passport, phone and belongings while I wait?
- What should family say to my employer and bank, and what should they avoid saying?
A defender who explains each answer in plain words is also showing you how the case will be run. If you do not understand an answer, say so. Understanding is part of the service you are entitled to, and you should leave every conversation knowing what happens next and when.
When the case sits between Denmark and Italy
An arrest in Copenhagen often has an Italian side that the arrested person did not mention to anyone: a former residence, a company, a bank account, a family dispute, an earlier investigation. Danish officers may know about it before you do, because information moves between countries faster than people assume. Telling your lawyer everything at the start prevents surprises at the hearing.
Documents are the first practical obstacle. Anything issued in Italy, such as an employment letter, a residence certificate, a court paper or a medical record, will probably need translating into the language of the proceedings, and some will need a formal certification before a foreign court will accept them. Ask relatives to find originals now and to keep them safe, because the translation and certification take longer than the hearing allows.
Time differences are small, but the working day of a Danish court and the opening hours of an Italian office do not overlap perfectly, and a request made late in the afternoon in one country is often not handled until the next day in the other. The post between the countries is slow compared with the clock in a custody case, so important papers should travel by the fastest route and be sent as scans in parallel.
Coordination between defenders matters most. A Danish lawyer knows the court and the procedure; an Italian lawyer knows the Italian file and can say whether an Italian measure exists. They should speak early, agree on a single account of the facts and decide who handles each audience. The consulate can confirm your detention and pass messages, but it does not conduct the defence.
The terms you will meet on the documents
The papers you receive, or hear read aloud, use a small set of recurring expressions. These are the ones that appear on this page.
- Preliminary statutory hearing. The first appearance before a judge after arrest, which must happen within the Danish time limit. It is where the judge decides what happens to you next.
- Release. You leave, with or without conditions. Read the conditions carefully, since breaking them can produce a new arrest.
- Custody. You remain detained, on grounds the judge accepts, until the next decision or hearing.
- Extension. The judge allows the arrest to continue for a further period, which can be repeated where the evidence is not yet sufficient to decide.
- Grounds. The reasons the police or prosecutor give for holding you, such as a risk of jeopardising the investigation. They are the target of any challenge.
- European Arrest Warrant. A request between European countries to hand over a person for prosecution or a sentence, which follows a different track from an ordinary arrest in Denmark.
- Evidence not yet sufficient. The phrase police use to justify more time. It means they have not completed their case, not that they have concluded you are guilty.
Ask for any other word on the papers to be explained, and do not guess its meaning from a similar-sounding word in Italian or English.
How the studio takes on a Danish arrest
You can contact the studio by telephone or by email, using the details on this page, and the Rome, Milan and Naples offices are all able to take the call. Say who is arrested, in which city, when, and what papers exist. If the family cannot answer, send photographs of whatever has arrived and we will work from them.
The studio does not replace the Danish defender. A person arrested in Copenhagen needs a lawyer who can appear before the Danish court, and the studio works with correspondents there. Our role is to explain to the family and the person detained what is happening in Italian or English, to assess whether any Italian proceeding is involved, to coordinate with the Danish defender, and to prepare the Italian side of the file if a warrant or an investigation exists in Italy.
The appointment is in writing, signed by the person concerned or, where that is not possible, by a family member acting for them, and fees are explained before work starts. The first conversation is spent on facts: what happened, what paper exists, when the next hearing is. Send documents as clear scans, labelled and dated, and not as long unsorted chats. We are reachable outside office hours for urgent developments, because custody decisions arrive at any time, and we tell the family at each stage what has been done and what comes next.
About the lawyer
Most people reach this office in the middle of something they did not plan for: an arrest in another country, a search at dawn, a summons that arrived while they were away from Italy. The first conversation is with Avv. Massimo Romano himself, not with a secretary who takes a message. He is a criminal defence lawyer admitted to plead before the Italian Court of Cassation, and his work has long centred on Italian criminal procedure, European arrest warrants and extradition. On that first call he asks what documents exist, who has seen the person detained, and which authority is involved. No assessment is given before the papers have been read. Afterwards he sets out, in writing, what can be done from Italy and what has to be done where the person is held. Relatives who do not speak Italian are not left translating for themselves: the office speaks with the family in English, by telephone and in writing.
Call the office, or write on WhatsApp if that is easier from abroad. Have to hand the full name of the person involved, the city and country where they are held, and any document already received, even as a photograph.
Avv. Massimo Romano — criminal defence lawyer, admitted to the Italian Court of Cassation
Iscritto all'Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553 | Patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015
Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138
+39 335 669 3954 · WhatsApp
