Rome — Via Avicenna 97 · Milan · Naples avvmassimoromano@gmail.com
Advice 24/7+39 335 669 3954
Offences and defences

Fire in Italy: when negligence becomes a criminal charge

by Massimo Romano4 min readupdated 2026-08-05
Road at dusk
Direct answer

Italian law punishes fire on separate levels, and the distinction that decides these cases is not between wanting a fire and not wanting it. Starting a fire deliberately is a grave offence, graver still where woodland is involved. Causing a fire through carelessness is a different offence altogether, and it is the provision that reaches barbecues, discarded cigarettes, the burning of garden waste and fireworks.

For anyone who owns or rents property in the countryside the practical trap is local rather than national. Regions and municipalities issue orders prohibiting the lighting of fires during high-risk periods, and those periods, their boundaries and their conditions differ from area to area and from year to year, so conduct that was lawful in spring can be an offence in summer a short distance away. What matters after a fire is the order in force on the day, the weather, and what can be shown about how the fire began and why it spread.

Avv. Massimo Romano — Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553, patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015 — Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138 — +39 335 669 3954

In brief

  • A fire started deliberately and a fire caused by carelessness are distinct offences, and the heavier brackets apply where woodland is involved in either form.
  • Nobody who lights a barbecue intends a wildfire, and nobody needs to, because the negligent offence is complete when a fire spreads beyond control through carelessness.
  • Regional and municipal orders govern when fires may be lit at all, and they change by area and by season rather than following a single national rule.
  • Burning garden waste and pruning is ordinary agricultural practice within limits, and outside those limits it falls under the rules on waste instead.
  • Wind is the factor courts examine before any other, so burning on a windy day is very difficult to defend whatever the local order permits.
  • Fireworks generate separate exposure: the articles themselves are regulated, and unauthorised categories, excess quantities and homemade devices engage the rules on explosives.
  • The consequences of a fire are charged separately again, so injury, death or damage caused adds offences rather than being absorbed into the fire charge.
  • Where a claim has been made on a policy, the insurer's own technical examination usually reaches the prosecutor, and it shapes the account the defence has to meet.

The offences

Conduct · Bracket · Provision
ConductBracketProvision
Deliberate fireThree to seven yearsArt. 423 Criminal Code
Deliberate woodland fireFour to ten yearsArt. 423-bis
Negligent woodland fireOne to five yearsArt. 423-bis(2)
Negligent fire generallyOne to five yearsArt. 449
AggravationWhere houses, vehicles or crops are endangeredArt. 423-bis
Injury or death causedSeparate offences in additionArts. 589 and 590

The distinction that decides these cases is not between wanting a fire and not wanting one. It is between a fire that spread beyond control through carelessness — which is fully criminal — and one that did not spread at all. Nobody who lights a barbecue intends a wildfire, and nobody needs to.

Summer, and the rules that change by the week

Regions and municipalities issue orders prohibiting the lighting of fires during high-risk periods, and those periods, their boundaries and their conditions differ from one area to another and from one year to another. Conduct that was lawful in May can be an offence in July a few kilometres away.

For someone who owns or rents property in the countryside this is a practical trap: burning garden waste and pruning is normal agricultural practice within limits, and outside those limits it falls under the rules on waste, dealt with in regulatory prosecutions.

  • Check the regional and municipal orders in force on the day, not the general rule.
  • Observe the limits on quantity, distance and time of day where burning is permitted.
  • Do not burn anything other than vegetation from the site itself.
  • Avoid entirely on windy days: it is the factor courts examine first.
  • Keep the means to extinguish a fire immediately to hand.

Fireworks

Fireworks generate two separate exposures. The articles themselves are regulated: unauthorised categories, quantities beyond what may be held, and homemade devices engage the rules on explosives, which are serious offences quite apart from any fire.

And the consequences are prosecuted separately: a fire caused, an injury caused, damage caused. New Year is the period in which these cases concentrate, and the recurring defendant is not an organiser but someone who bought articles that turned out not to be in a permitted category.

What the defence works on

These cases are decided by the technical reconstruction of the origin and spread of the fire, and by the meteorological and site conditions. That is expert territory, and the defence expert has to be appointed before the official examination of the scene, not after it — the scene is altered within days.

The second line is causation. Where a fire had more than one possible origin, or spread because of conditions or because of what someone else did or failed to do, the question is whether the conduct charged remains the cause in law. The framework on defence investigations is in defence investigations in Italy.

The comparison below separates the deliberate offence from the negligent one, because the same burnt field can be charged either way depending on what is shown.

ElementFire started deliberatelyFire caused by carelessness
What must be provedThat the fire was wanted, or accepted as a consequence.That a duty of care was breached and the fire followed.
Typical factual settingIgnition with an accelerant, or several points of origin.A barbecue, a cigarette, burning of waste, a firework.
Where the argument liesAttribution: who was present and who lit it.Whether the precautions taken were adequate in the conditions.
Effect of the settingWoodland and endangered dwellings raise the brackets substantially.The same aggravating circumstances apply to the negligent form.
Consequences causedInjury or death is charged in addition.Injury or death is charged in addition here as well.

Fire and insurance

Where a claim followed a fire, a further exposure arises: insurance fraud, if the account given to the insurer does not match the reconstruction. The two files then run together, and statements given to an insurer are documents. The framework is in false reports and insurance fraud.

Frequently asked questions

Can I be prosecuted for a fire I did not intend?

Yes. Causing a fire through carelessness is a separate offence carrying one to five years, and it is the provision that reaches barbecues, cigarettes and garden clearance.

Can I burn garden waste?

Within limits, as normal agricultural practice, but regional and municipal orders prohibit it during high-risk periods, and those vary by area and by year.

Are fireworks an offence in themselves?

Unauthorised categories, excess quantities and homemade devices engage the rules on explosives, which are serious offences quite apart from any fire caused.

What decides these cases?

The technical reconstruction of the origin and spread. A defence expert must be appointed before the official examination, because the scene is altered within days.

If a fire has led to an investigation

The scene is examined in the first days and cannot be reconstructed later. First contact is free and covered by professional privilege.

Who ends up reading about a fire that led to an investigation

A fire is the kind of event that moves quickly from an accident to an inquiry, and the people on this page arrive from very different directions.

Some are people whose land, house or garden caught fire. A barbecue, a spark from a machine, the burning of cuttings or a bonfire in a dry season spread beyond control. Neighbours called the fire service, officers arrived, and a report was made. The owner now learns that a fire started through carelessness is an offence in its own right, and that the report has been sent to the prosecutor.

Others are tourists and holiday-makers. A cigarette on a dry hillside, a campfire on a beach, a fireworks display for a celebration, a gas stove in a rented property: the incident was brief and the consequences are not. They have to deal with an investigation in a country where they are guests.

A further group are people accused of starting a fire on purpose: in a dispute with a neighbour, to damage property, to collect insurance, or in woodland. They face a far more serious charge, and the evidence is often technical.

Finally there are landlords, employers and event organisers who are asked what they did to prevent the fire. A hotel owner, the manager of a farm or the host of an event may be questioned about safety and permissions. Each of these people needs to know quickly which of the possible offences is being considered, because the answer determines the whole defence.

Most of these prosecutions follow conduct that felt routine, so the table pairs each activity with the rules that govern it and what to check before starting.

ActivityWhat governs itWhat to check before starting
Burning pruning and garden wasteAgricultural limits on quantity, distance and time of day.The regional and municipal orders in force on that day.
Burning anything other than vegetation from the siteThe rules on waste rather than those on agricultural practice.Whether the material may be burnt at all, which it usually may not.
Lighting a barbecue outdoorsLocal prohibitions during high-risk periods.Wind conditions and the distance to vegetation and buildings.
Using fireworksThe regulation of categories, quantities and possession.The category of the article and whether holding it is permitted.
Clearing land with machineryFire risk from sparks, and any seasonal restriction.That extinguishing means are immediately to hand.

What a fire investigation does to daily life

The practical effects begin before any charge. A property that burned may be sealed by the authorities while experts examine it, so that the owner cannot enter to retrieve belongings or begin repairs. A farm or a business that lost buildings or crops may be unable to operate, and workers may be sent home without pay. A holiday let that suffered damage cannot be rented, and bookings must be cancelled.

Money is the next concern. Insurers investigate fires with particular care, and a policy may be suspended while they establish the cause. A payment may be delayed or refused, and the investigation by the insurer can run alongside the criminal inquiry. A person who also faces a claim from neighbours or from the owner of land that burned finds that civil liability and criminal inquiry advance together.

Reputation is easily damaged in small communities. News of a fire spreads, and people assume the worst. Landlords, employers and clients may react. Where woodland is involved, public concern is high and the authorities respond firmly, so the person at the centre may feel that the process has already decided the matter.

Travel is affected for visitors who are questioned and then told to remain available. A flight home may have to be delayed, and a summons may follow a person abroad. Practical steps include keeping photographs of the scene and the property, contacting the insurer carefully, and recording the names of everybody who helped or saw the fire.

Decisions in the days after a fire

Several decisions arise quickly, and each of them has consequences that are easier to see in advance.

Whether to give an account to the officers. People want to explain that it was an accident, and in many cases it was. But an account given on the day, before the cause is known, can contain details that later prove wrong, and the difference between a deliberate act and a careless act rests on the details. Giving a short statement of facts and asking to say more after speaking to a lawyer is a measured course.

Whether to repair or clear the site. The urge to clean up is strong. But a burned site is evidence, and the authority's experts may need to examine it. Moving debris, rebuilding or demolishing before the site is released can look like concealment and can destroy the material that would show how the fire began. Ask permission in writing, and photograph everything beforehand.

Whether to engage your own expert. The cause of a fire is a technical question, and the defence may need its own examination. An expert can ask to attend the site while it is still intact. Delay can end the option. The choice depends on the cost and on how much turns on the cause.

Records that show how a fire began

The question in every fire case is how the fire started, and what the person did or did not do. Evidence is gathered from the site and from the surrounding paperwork.

  • Photographs and videos of the site before, during and after the fire, with their dates, and any footage from cameras, phones or neighbours.
  • The names and contact details of people who saw the fire start, who helped to put it out, or who were present earlier that day.
  • Records from the fire service and the police, including reports, incident numbers and the names of the units that attended.
  • The weather and wind conditions on the day, and any local notices or restrictions on lighting fires that were in force.
  • Maintenance and purchase records for equipment, appliances and installations that might have caused a fire, including servicing history.
  • Permits, licences and event permissions that cover the activity, and any correspondence with the local authority.
  • Insurance policies, claim forms and messages with the insurer, with dates.
  • Your own account of the day, written for the lawyer only, with times and places.

Do not repair or throw away any equipment connected with the fire until the lawyer says so. Label each photograph with the time and place, and store copies away from your phone.

Questions for the lawyer about a fire file

The common question is whether the fire is treated as deliberate. A fuller set of questions gets to the point.

  • Which offence is under consideration: a deliberate fire, a careless fire, or something else, and has this been stated or only implied?
  • What does the authority say caused the fire, and on what examination?
  • Was the fire in woodland or open country, and does that change how seriously it is treated?
  • Were any people injured or endangered, and does that add further charges?
  • Can the defence appoint its own expert, and can the expert still see the site?
  • How does the insurance claim interact with the criminal inquiry, and what should I say to the insurer?
  • Do the neighbours or the landowner have a claim, and how will it be pursued?
  • If I am a visitor, must I remain in Italy, and can I be represented in my absence?

A lawyer who has seen the expert reports can answer these specifically; before that, the answers are provisional. Ask also which of the reports the lawyer has seen and which are still awaited, and whether the lawyer expects the cause of the fire to be disputed between experts. That tells you how long the matter is likely to stay open and what it may cost.

A fire file is decided on technical material gathered afterwards, and the table shows what exists, who holds it and what it establishes.

RecordWho holds itWhat it establishes
Fire service intervention reportThe fire service that attended.The point of origin, the direction of spread and the conditions found.
Weather data for the dayThe meteorological service for the area.Wind and temperature, which bear directly on foreseeability.
The local order in forceThe municipality or the regional authority.Whether lighting a fire was permitted at that place on that date.
Photographs and footage taken at the timeNeighbours, passers-by and the owner.The sequence of the spread and the precautions actually in place.
Technical report for the insurerThe loss adjuster instructed on the claim.The cause advanced by the insurer, which the defence must address.
Purchase and maintenance recordsThe owner, the supplier and the servicing company.Whether equipment was sound and used as intended.

When the fire involves a foreigner or a foreign owner

Fires in holiday areas often involve people from other countries: tourists, holiday-home owners, short-term tenants, event guests. Their situation is awkward because the procedure is in Italian, the owners of burned land are Italian, and the visitor intends to go home.

Notice is the obvious problem. A summons or a request for a statement may be sent to the address given on the day, to a holiday let, or to a hotel. It may reach nobody. Give the lawyer an address that will be staffed, and ask a relative to forward post. A hearing may be scheduled for a date when you are abroad, and the lawyer should know whether you can be represented.

Documents from your country, such as insurance policies, proof of ownership of a property, or records of an appliance bought there, need certified translations. Insurers in your country may begin their own inquiry, and what you tell them may reach the Italian authority. Calls across time zones need planning, and the working days in the countries may differ.

The consulate can confirm identity and help with certified copies but cannot choose counsel or enter into the investigation. If you have a lawyer at home, both lawyers should speak, so that the account given to your insurer, to your home authorities and to the Italian court is the same. Do not leave devices, appliances or fuel containers behind without recording where they are.

How the studio handles a fire investigation

The studio starts with a conversation, in English if needed, in which you describe the fire, the site, who was present and what the authorities have said. You send photographs, video, any notice you were given and the insurance papers, as clear files by email.

A written letter of instruction sets out the work and the fees, and a power of attorney allows the lawyer to act. The lawyer reads the reports, establishes which offence is under consideration, and explains what the authority must show and what the defence can add. Where the cause is technical, the studio proposes an expert who can examine the site and the reports, and agrees the cost with you in advance.

The studio also deals with the practical aspects. It can write to the authority to ask when the site will be released, to request a copy of the technical reports, and to arrange a visit by your expert. It advises on what to say to the insurer, so that nothing said there contradicts the account given elsewhere. Offices in Rome, Milan and Naples allow meetings in person, and urgent situations, such as an interview on the day after a fire, are handled at any hour. The studio does not promise a result, and will tell you when a step could harm your position. Where you are abroad, it coordinates with your lawyer and with the insurer.

What to avoid after a fire

Panic after a fire produces actions that look sensible and create problems.

  • Do not clear, repair or demolish the site until the authority has released it. The remains are evidence.
  • Do not throw away the equipment, the fuel container or the appliance you think was involved. Keep it, and say where it is.
  • Do not alter your account to fit what you hear from others. If your memory changes, tell the lawyer, not the officers.
  • Do not contact neighbours to agree what happened. Matching accounts look arranged.
  • Do not post photographs or comments about the fire online. Posts are collected.
  • Do not submit an insurance claim with figures you cannot support. An inflated claim after a fire invites a further inquiry.
  • Do not sign a record or a release for the insurer without reading it. It may include admissions or waivers.

The sensible course is to record what you can, touch nothing that matters, and speak to counsel. People often ask what they may do for neighbours who lost property. Offering help is natural, but an offer of money made before the cause is known can be read as an acknowledgement of fault, so discuss any payment with the lawyer. Kindness is still possible: you can offer practical assistance, such as lending tools or a place to stay, without commenting on how the fire began.

Words that appear in a fire file

The documents use Italian terms whose meaning depends on small distinctions.

  • Incendio doloso is a deliberate fire: setting something alight on purpose, or accepting that it will burn.
  • Incendio colposo is a fire caused by carelessness, without intent, which is the provision that reaches barbecues, cigarettes and fireworks.
  • Incendio boschivo is a woodland fire, treated more severely because of the danger to nature and people.
  • Dolo is intent, the state of mind of a person who means to do the act.
  • Colpa is fault in the sense of carelessness, negligence or breach of a rule, without intent.
  • Pubblica incolumità is public safety, the danger to people that can make a fire a more serious offence.
  • Perizia is an expert report, and a perizia di parte is a report commissioned by a party.
  • Concause are contributing causes, other factors that played a part in how the fire spread.

The difference between dolo and colpa is the hinge of most fire files. A document that switches between these words, or that adds the word for contributing causes, signals a change in how the authority sees the case, and the lawyer should be told straight away. If a report uses a term not on this list, send a photograph of the page so that its place in the file can be explained.

About the lawyer

Criminal defence is the whole of this practice. Avv. Massimo Romano is enrolled with the Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli and pleads before the Court of Cassation; the work that reaches him concerns Italian criminal procedure, extradition, European arrest warrants, and cases where an Italian citizen is held by a foreign authority. He takes instructions directly. The first contact is short and factual: what the charge is said to be, where the person is, what has already been signed or handed over. Nothing is promised at that stage, because the file has usually not been read. What follows the call is practical, a list of documents to collect, contact with the authority or with local counsel abroad, and a plan for the next hearing or request. Where relatives do not speak Italian, the conversation continues in their own language, and written updates are sent in that language as well, so nobody relies on second-hand translation.

Ring the office directly, or write on WhatsApp if calling is difficult. Keep beside you the summons or the record of the search, and the name of any lawyer already acting.

Avv. Massimo Romano — criminal defence lawyer, admitted to the Italian Court of Cassation
Iscritto all'Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553 | Patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015
Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138
+39 335 669 3954 · WhatsApp

Reachable 24 hours

Tell me what has happened

First contact is free and covered by professional privilege, at any hour including nights and holidays.

Bar of Naples, admission no. 14553 · Rome · Milan · Naples

WhatsAppCall now
Write on WhatsApp