Rome — Via Avicenna 97 · Milan · Naples avvmassimoromano@gmail.com
Advice 24/7+39 335 669 3954
Costs, lawyers and practical matters

Getting your phone, car, money or passport back in Italy

by Massimo Romano4 min readupdated 2026-08-05
Administrative desk with a record and a pen
Direct answer

A seizure can be challenged before a court within a short period running from its execution, and that deadline is the one missed most often because nobody points it out. Independently of any challenge, the return of an item can be requested at any time once it is no longer needed for the proceedings. Where a forensic copy of a telephone or a laptop has been made and verified, continued retention of the device itself is usually contestable.

What matters first is identifying which kind of seizure has been imposed, because it is written on the document handed over and it determines the route. A telephone held because the messages on it matter and a vehicle held because it may be confiscated are different situations with different arguments, and treating them alike wastes the only fast remedy available.

Avv. Massimo Romano — Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553, patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015 — Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138 — +39 335 669 3954

In brief

  • Evidential seizure holds an item because it is evidence, and the route is return once the evidential need has been exhausted rather than a challenge to the measure.
  • Preventive seizure is imposed to stop an offence continuing or worsening, and it can be taken to a court for review within the short period the code fixes.
  • Seizure with a view to confiscation is tied to the outcome of the case, so the arguments there run differently again.
  • The review is a full examination: whether the conditions existed at all, whether the item really relates to the offence alleged, and whether the measure is proportionate.
  • If the review period passes the item is not lost, but the fast route is gone and what remains is an application for return decided on narrower grounds.
  • In a digital case the evidence is the forensic copy rather than the physical object, so retention of the handset or the laptop has to be justified separately once the copy exists.
  • A seizure relating to a particular episode does not authorise the exploration of years of a person's digital life, and limitation by correspondent, keyword and date range can be requested.
  • Where a copy is made in conditions that cannot be reproduced identically, the defence is entitled to notice and may appoint its own expert to attend.

Three kinds of seizure, three different answers

Type · Purpose · Route
TypePurposeRoute
Evidential seizureThe item is evidence of the offenceReturn once the evidential need is exhausted
Preventive seizureTo stop the offence continuing or aggravatingReview before a court within ten days
Seizure with a view to confiscationThe item may be confiscated on convictionTied to the outcome of the case

The first question is always which one you are facing, and it is written on the document you were given. A phone taken because messages on it matter, and a car taken because it may be confiscated, are two different situations with different arguments.

The ten days

Where the seizure is preventive, an application for review can be made within ten days of execution. It is a full examination: the court looks at whether the conditions were met at all, whether the item really relates to the alleged offence, and whether the measure is proportionate.

The same short period applies to challenging orders in this area generally. If it passes, the item is not lost, but the fast route is gone and what remains is an application for return, which takes longer and is decided on a narrower basis.

Phones and computers

These are the items people most need back, and there is a strong argument available. The evidence in a digital case is the forensic copy, not the physical object: once the copy has been made and verified, continued retention of the handset or laptop has to be justified separately.

The second argument concerns scope. A seizure relating to one episode does not authorise the exploration of years of a person's digital life, and the courts have progressively required that irrelevant material be returned or excluded. Limitation by keyword, correspondent and date range can be requested, and so can return of everything outside it.

If a copy is being made, the defence is entitled to notice where the operation cannot be repeated identically, and may appoint its own expert. The details are in the guide on cybercrime and digital evidence.

Cash and bank accounts

Cash seized at a border for a breach of the declaration obligation follows the administrative route rather than the criminal one, and part of the sum is retained as a penalty; the rest is recoverable on application.

A bank account frozen in a criminal investigation is a different matter and a far more serious one, because it is normally tied to a calculation of the supposed profit of the alleged offence. Attacking that calculation is the effective route: the amount is very often overstated, and it sets the ceiling of everything that follows.

The kinds of seizure are compared below, because the answer to a seizure depends entirely on which one has been imposed.

Kind of seizureWhy the item is heldRoute available
Evidential seizureThe item is evidence of the offence under investigation.Request return once the evidential need has been exhausted.
Preventive seizureTo prevent the offence continuing or its consequences worsening.Review before a court within the short period after execution.
Seizure with a view to confiscationThe item may be confiscated if there is a conviction.Argued with the merits, and attacked on the link to the offence.
Seizure of a sum corresponding to a gainIt stands in place of a benefit said to have been obtained.Challenged by reconstructing the gain actually alleged.
Seizure of documents and dataThe content is relevant to the matter investigated.Return of the medium once a verified copy exists.

Passports and documents

A passport may be retained as part of a precautionary measure prohibiting departure from Italy, in which case it is returned when that measure is lifted or varied. That is a different situation from a seizure of evidence, and the remedy is an application about the measure, not about the document.

If you need to travel for work or family reasons while a measure is in force, that can be applied for, and it is granted more readily where the request is specific, documented and limited.

What to do

  • Get the seizure record and read what type of seizure it says.
  • Count ten days from execution, not from when you found a lawyer.
  • Ask for a copy of the data if a device has been taken, so you can work on the same material.
  • Where a copy exists, apply for return of the device itself.
  • Where a business is affected, ask for release of what is needed to keep operating: it is granted more often than it is requested.

Frequently asked questions

How long can Italian police keep my phone?

Only as long as it is needed. Once a forensic copy has been made and verified, continued retention of the device itself is usually contestable.

Can I challenge a seizure?

Yes, before a court within ten days of execution. After that the fast route is gone and only an application for return remains.

They seized cash at the airport. Can I get it back?

Where it is a breach of the declaration obligation the route is administrative: part of the sum is retained as a penalty and the rest can be recovered on application.

When do I get my passport back?

If it was retained under a measure prohibiting departure, when that measure is lifted or varied. Travel for specific documented reasons can also be applied for.

If something has been seized

The record and the date of execution decide which remedies are still open. First contact is free and covered by professional privilege.

Different categories of property raise different arguments, and the table sets out what tends to work for each of the items people most need back.

ItemArgument that tends to be available
Telephone or laptopThe verified copy is the evidence, so the device itself need not be retained.
VehicleIts connection with the offence, and the loss caused by holding a working asset.
CashDocumented lawful origin, and the absence of any link to the conduct alleged.
Bank accountThat the freeze exceeds the sum alleged, and that it blocks ordinary living costs.
Passport and identity documentsThat the restriction is disproportionate where ties and residence are documented.
Business records and serversThat trading is prevented, and that a copy serves the investigation equally.

What seizure does to ordinary life

A seized phone is more than a device. It is the banking app, the boarding passes, the contacts of a business, the photographs of children, the verification codes that open every other account. A person without it cannot receive a code, cannot show a ticket and cannot reach a client. Within hours they discover how much of their life ran through the device that the police now hold in a plastic bag.

A seized car stops commuting, deliveries and school runs. A seized passport stops travel and, for foreigners, can stop a return home, with a flight booked and a job waiting abroad. Seized cash can be rent, wages for a small business, or the money for a medical bill. A blocked bank account stops standing orders, and the consequences compound: a missed rent payment, a bounced direct debit, a refused insurance renewal. Business owners find that suppliers stop delivering and customers stop paying while the funds are blocked.

The effect is sharper for people who live abroad. A foreign visitor whose phone is taken may have no other way to contact family or the employer, and may be unable to prove their identity or their address when they need to rent a replacement. A worker whose laptop is seized cannot work. A freelancer cannot meet a deadline. A company that lent a laptop or a vehicle to an employee sees its own property held for the case of someone else. All of this happens before any court has decided that anything was wrong, and it can last as long as the investigation does unless somebody asks for it to end.

Who ends up searching for this

The usual reader has just had a phone, a laptop, a car or a sum of money taken during a stop, a search or an arrest. They hold a record of seizure that lists the items and have no idea what to do with it. Some do not even know which kind of seizure it is, which matters, because the way back differs for each kind.

Another reader is a family member. A parent discovers that the son's phone has been taken and that photographs of the family, medical records and the only copy of a document are on it. A spouse learns that the joint account has been blocked and that wages cannot be paid. These readers want to know whether they can act on behalf of the person, and whether the family's own property can be affected.

A further kind of reader is a business owner or a landlord. The vehicle was rented out and is now seized, or the premises were let to a person who is under investigation. They are not suspected of anything, but their property is held, and they want it back. Their position as an owner not involved in the offence is different from that of the suspect, and the route they follow is often different too.

Papers to prepare before any application is made

  • The record of seizure: photograph every page, check the date and time, and the list of items. The deadline to challenge runs from the execution of the seizure, and the record proves when that was.
  • The order of the authority that decided the seizure, if you have been given it. It states the reasons and the purpose, and the purpose decides the route.
  • Proof of ownership: registration papers for a car, invoice or box for a phone, bank statements for money, a lease for premises. If the property is not yours, proof of the lawful arrangement under which you hold it.
  • Proof of need: why the item is needed for work, health or family, with letters from employers, doctors or schools. Courts weigh need against the interest of the investigation.
  • The source of cash and funds: payslips, tax returns, sale contracts, loan documents. Unexplained money is treated as suspicious, and clear documents often make the difference.
  • A list of what is on the device: apps, accounts, business data, medical or confidential information. It helps the lawyer to ask that a copy be made and the device returned.
  • Passwords and backups: do not hand them over informally. Ask the lawyer how to deal with requests for access.
  • The names of the officers and the office that carried out the seizure, so that applications go to the right place.

The choices that cannot wait

Several choices arise within days, and the deadline for the earliest is short and rarely explained.

Whether to challenge the seizure before a court within the time the law allows. The deadline is short and starts when the seizure is carried out, not when the family finds out. A challenge costs lawyer's time and requires reasons. If the deadline passes, the seizure cannot be reviewed in that way, and the person must rely on requests for return, which are slower and depend on the discretion of the authority holding the item.

Whether to ask for return or to wait. A request for return can be made at any time when the item is no longer needed. When a forensic copy of a phone or computer has been made, the original is often no longer needed, and a request can be made. The price of asking early is that it may draw attention to the item and prompt a closer look. The price of waiting is losing the use of it for months.

Whether to cooperate on access to a device. Giving the code may speed up a copy and the return of the device; it also opens the whole content to examination, including material that has nothing to do with the case. Limiting access through the lawyer protects privacy and may add delay.

An application is only as strong as the papers behind it, so the table lists what to assemble, who supplies it and what it is for.

DocumentWho supplies itWhat it is used for
The seizure record handed over on the dayThe force that carried out the seizure.Identifying the kind of seizure and the date execution began.
Proof of ownership or titleThe registry, the dealer or the lessor.Showing that the item belongs to someone other than the accused, where it does.
Evidence of the origin of moneyBanks, employers and accountants.Answering the assumption that cash held is connected with the offence.
Proof that the item is needed for workThe employer, clients or the company itself.Supporting proportionality and the harm caused by continued retention.
Confirmation that a forensic copy existsThe investigating authority, through disclosure.Grounding the request for the device itself to come back.
An expert report on the copyingThe expert appointed by the defence.Testing the method used and the scope of what was taken.

What not to do when something has been taken

  • Do not let the deadline pass while waiting for news. The officers will not remind you, and the family may learn of the seizure late.
  • Do not buy a replacement phone and restore the same accounts without advice. If the old device is still linked, some actions may appear to be tampering.
  • Do not remotely wipe or lock the seized device. It can be read as destruction of evidence, even if your reason was privacy.
  • Do not pass the passcode to a friend or a colleague. Someone else entering the account may alter data.
  • Do not move money out of other accounts to avoid a block. Transfers after a seizure are scrutinised as attempts to hide assets.
  • Do not complain on social media. Posts can be used to show attitude, and the details may reveal what you wish to keep private.
  • Do not drive a car if the registration papers have been taken. You may be fined or detained at a checkpoint.
  • Do not assume that returned items are intact. Check them, photograph them and note anything missing before signing for them.
  • Do not hand over items "voluntarily" without a written record. An informal handover can later be described as a seizure with no deadline attached, or as a gift you cannot reclaim.
  • Do not leave the scene without a copy of the record of seizure. Without it you cannot show when the deadline began or which items were taken.

Questions for the lawyer on a seizure

  • Which kind of seizure is this: for evidence, to prevent the offence continuing, or with a view to confiscation?
  • When did the deadline to challenge start, and when does it end?
  • Who is the right applicant: me, the owner, the company, or the person who held the item?
  • Has a forensic copy been made, and if so, why does the authority still need the original?
  • What can I ask for if I need the item back for work or health?
  • Will access to my phone cover everything on it, or can the search be limited to what relates to the case?
  • If funds are blocked, can an allowance be released for rent, wages or medical needs?
  • If the item is a passport, can I get permission to travel in specific circumstances?
  • What happens to the item if the case is closed, and who tells me?
  • If the item belongs to someone who is not under investigation, who must apply and with what proof?
  • Can I get a copy of the data I need for work while the original is kept?

The right questions depend on the type of seizure. A lawyer who does not ask which type it is has not read the paper. Ask also what the lawyer will file, and by when, so that the deadline has a name next to it.

When the item, the owner and the court are not in the same place

Seizures involving foreigners create difficulties that residents never face. The owner may be on a flight home when the deadline is running. The papers are in Italian, the lawyer needs a power of attorney, and the person who must sign it is in a different time zone. The immediate practical step is to arrange for the person to be represented, with an authority that has been signed and certified in a way the Italian court accepts. Ask the lawyer which form is needed before signing anything.

Proof of ownership also crosses borders. Registration papers for a foreign car, bank statements from an overseas institution and a foreign invoice for a phone all need translation, and sometimes certification, before an Italian office will rely on them. A translation prepared in a hurry can introduce errors in names and numbers, which then cause questions about whose property it is. Allow time for this, and keep the originals safe.

When funds are held in a foreign account, or the seized item was owned by a foreign company, it may be necessary to coordinate with a lawyer abroad about the consequences at home. A passport held by Italian authorities can also be a problem for a person trying to travel home: the consulate of their country may issue an emergency travel document, which allows departure but does not solve the Italian question, and a person who leaves without telling the lawyer may lose the chance to be heard. Calls should be arranged to suit the person's time zone, and documents should be sent by email in a form that can be forwarded without editing.

Words you will see on the record of seizure

  • Sequestro probatorio: seizure for evidence. The item is held because it proves the offence, and it should be returned when that need is exhausted.
  • Sequestro preventivo: seizure to stop the offence continuing or getting worse. It can be reviewed by a court within a short time.
  • Confisca: confiscation, the permanent loss of an item on conviction. A seizure aimed at confiscation is tied to the outcome of the case.
  • Riesame: the review of a seizure by a court. The deadline to ask for it is short and runs from execution.
  • Restituzione: return of the seized item, which can be requested when it is no longer needed.
  • Copia forense: a forensic copy of a device, an exact image of its contents made by experts. After it exists, holding the original is often open to challenge.
  • Verbale di sequestro: the record of seizure, listing the items taken, the date and the officers. Keep it safe.
  • Decreto: the written order of the authority that decided on the seizure, stating the reasons.
  • Dissequestro: the lifting of a seizure, after which the item is returned to the person entitled to it.
  • Corpo del reato: the thing connected to the offence, such as a device used or an object produced by it, which is the usual target of evidential seizure.
  • Cancelleria: the court registry, where applications are filed, deadlines are recorded and returned items are often collected.

How the studio works on seizure and return

We begin with the record of seizure, because it tells us the type, the date and the items. If you send a photograph, we can usually say within the same day which deadline is running and what the route is. The engagement is confirmed in writing with an estimate of cost in phases, because a challenge and a request for return are separate pieces of work.

The opening call is used to ask what the item is needed for and who owns it. We then explain the options, and what the authority is likely to say in reply. Documents can be sent as photographs or scans by email, and nobody has to come to an office to begin. The studio works in English and Italian, and where a client prefers another language, we arrange an interpreter for the main conversations.

Offices in Rome, Milan and Naples allow a lawyer to file at the court that ordered the seizure and to attend if a hearing is set. For a client abroad, we coordinate the power of attorney and the translation of ownership papers, and, when funds or property are in another country, we work with a lawyer there. We are reachable outside office hours when a deadline is about to expire. We cannot promise that an item will be released, because the decision belongs to the court and the prosecutor. The email address is avvmassimoromano@gmail.com.

About the lawyer

Most people reach this office in the middle of something they did not plan for: an arrest in another country, a search at dawn, a summons that arrived while they were away from Italy. The first conversation is with Avv. Massimo Romano himself, not with a secretary who takes a message. He is a criminal defence lawyer admitted to plead before the Italian Court of Cassation, and his work has long centred on Italian criminal procedure, European arrest warrants and extradition. On that first call he asks what documents exist, who has seen the person detained, and which authority is involved. No assessment is given before the papers have been read. Afterwards he sets out, in writing, what can be done from Italy and what has to be done where the person is held. Relatives who do not speak Italian are not left translating for themselves: the office speaks with the family in English, by telephone and in writing.

Call the office, or write on WhatsApp if that is easier from abroad. Have to hand the full name of the person involved, the city and country where they are held, and any document already received, even as a photograph.

Avv. Massimo Romano — criminal defence lawyer, admitted to the Italian Court of Cassation
Iscritto all'Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553 | Patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015
Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138
+39 335 669 3954 · WhatsApp

Reachable 24 hours

Tell me what has happened

First contact is free and covered by professional privilege, at any hour including nights and holidays.

Bar of Naples, admission no. 14553 · Rome · Milan · Naples

WhatsAppCall now
Write on WhatsApp