Rome — Via Avicenna 97 · Milan · Naples avvmassimoromano@gmail.com
Advice 24/7+39 335 669 3954
Offences and defences

US service members and Italian criminal jurisdiction

by Massimo Romano4 min readupdated 2026-08-05
Empty courtroom
Direct answer

Under the NATO Status of Forces Agreement, Italy and the United States both have jurisdiction over offences committed here by service members. The sending state has the primary right for acts done in the performance of official duty and for offences against its own personnel or property. For everything else — off duty, off base, at the weekend — Italy has the primary right, and the case is prosecuted in an Italian court.

The agreement does not remove Italian jurisdiction and it creates no immunity: it allocates priority between systems that both have it. Personnel at the Italian bases are covered, together with the civilian component and dependants, and dependants are the most often surprised because they have no duty status to invoke. A waiver is a request between governments, granted case by case, and the Italian case proceeds while it is pending.

Avv. Massimo Romano — Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553, patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015 — Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138 — +39 335 669 3954

In brief

  • Duty status has to be certified for the sending state's primary right to apply, which makes the question documentary rather than a matter of assertion.
  • Offences against United States personnel or property fall to the sending state where they occur within the force, and that limit is narrower than people assume.
  • An off-duty offence against an Italian is the ordinary case and belongs to the Italian courts, as does any incident off base involving civilians, driving offences and drink driving included.
  • Dependants have no duty status available to them at all, which is why a family member's case is handled entirely within the Italian system.
  • A waiver can be requested in either direction, but it is neither routine nor quick, and the Italian proceedings continue while the request is pending.
  • The Italian prosecution looks like any other: the same stages after an arrest, the same validation hearing, the same absence of bail, and the same deadline for applying to the review panel.
  • Living on base raises a specific problem about an address suitable for house arrest, and it has to be addressed at the hearing rather than afterwards.
  • A criminal outcome in Italy is a conviction like any other, with consequences that follow the person home, and command support does not alter the Italian case.

Who this applies to

Tens of thousands of people are covered: personnel stationed at Aviano, Vicenza, Naples and Sigonella, the civilian component, and dependants. Dependants in particular are frequently surprised, because they have no duty status to invoke at all.

The framework is Article VII of the NATO Status of Forces Agreement. It does not remove Italian jurisdiction and it does not create immunity. It allocates priority between two systems that both have jurisdiction over the same act.

How jurisdiction is allocated

Situation · Primary right · Note
SituationPrimary rightNote
Act in performance of official dutyUnited StatesDuty status must be certified
Offence against US personnel or propertyUnited StatesWithin the force
Off-duty offence against an ItalianItalyThe ordinary case
Off-base incident with civiliansItalyBars, roads, town centres
Driving offences off baseItalyIncluding drink driving
DependantsItalyNo duty status available
WaiverEither state may waive in favour of the otherRequested through channels, not automatic

The waiver is where expectations and reality diverge most. It is a request between governments, granted case by case, and it is neither routine nor quick. A case proceeds in the Italian system while it is pending.

What an Italian prosecution looks like

Exactly like any other. The same first ninety-six hours after an arrest, the same validation hearing, the same absence of bail, the same precautionary measures, the same review deadline of ten days.

Two features matter particularly here. Italian law provides no bail, so no financial arrangement secures release: the position is decided on the risks and on the availability of a suitable address, which for someone living on base raises a specific question that has to be addressed at the hearing. And a criminal outcome in Italy is a conviction like any other, with consequences that follow the person home.

The Italian procedure is set out in Italian criminal procedure explained and the detention regime in the guide on precautionary measures.

Command support is not a defence

Legal assistance provided through the command exists to advise on the military consequences: administrative action, career effects, the possibility of separate proceedings under military law. It does not, and cannot, conduct your defence before an Italian court.

Only a lawyer admitted to the Italian bar can do that. Both are needed, and they need to be talking to each other, because a step taken on one side routinely affects the other.

Priority between the two systems is allocated situation by situation, and that allocation is where expectations usually go wrong. The table sets it out.

SituationWhich state has the primary rightNote
An act done in the performance of official dutyThe United StatesDuty status has to be certified
An offence against United States personnel or propertyThe United StatesWithin the force
An off-duty offence against an ItalianItalyThe ordinary case
An incident off base involving civiliansItalyBars, roads and town centres
A driving offence committed off baseItalyDrink driving included
An offence by a dependantItalyNo duty status is available to invoke
A waiver of the primary rightEither state may waive in favour of the otherRequested through channels, and never automatic

Two proceedings, one set of facts

  • Statements. An account given in one process can surface in the other. What is said in the first hours has consequences on both sides.
  • Timing. Administrative action does not wait for the Italian case, and an Italian outcome may arrive long after career decisions have been taken.
  • Reassignment. Leaving Italy does not end an Italian proceeding, and a case can continue and conclude in your absence in the circumstances the law allows.
  • Records. An Italian conviction exists independently of anything decided within the command.

Frequently asked questions

Can I be tried in an Italian court as a US service member?

Yes. Under the NATO Status of Forces Agreement Italy has the primary right to exercise jurisdiction over offences committed off duty, and there is no immunity.

What if the incident happened off base on my own time?

That is the ordinary case in which Italy has the primary right, and it is prosecuted in an Italian court under Italian procedure.

Will the command handle my defence?

No. Command legal assistance advises on military and administrative consequences. Only a lawyer admitted to the Italian bar can defend you before an Italian court.

Does a waiver of jurisdiction happen automatically?

No. It is requested through official channels and decided case by case, and the Italian proceedings continue while it is pending.

If an incident has occurred

The first hours count more here than anywhere, because two systems start recording accounts at the same time. First contact is free and covered by professional privilege, at any hour.

Who reads this, and what happened

Readers arrive from a few situations, and each involves a person in uniform or attached to a base who has met the Italian criminal system.

Some are service members who were stopped or arrested off base after a night out. A fight outside a bar, a collision, a dispute with a taxi driver, a charge involving drink or drugs: the incident happened on a weekend, away from duty, and an Italian officer took the report. The member is back at the base, but Italian papers have followed. They want to know whether the case belongs to Italy or to their own command.

Others are dependants: spouses, teenagers and adult children of personnel stationed at Aviano, Vicenza, Naples or Sigonella. They have no duty status to invoke and are sometimes surprised to learn that the Italian system treats them like anybody else. A teenager caught shoplifting, a spouse in a traffic dispute, a young adult in a nightclub incident: each faces Italian police and Italian courts.

A further group are civilian employees and contractors, whose status depends on their arrangements, and who often have little guidance.

The last group are commanders, legal officers and family support staff, who are asked what Italy can do and what they can do. They need a plain description of how the systems relate. Whoever you are, the same early question arises: is this an Italian matter, an American matter, or both, and who is in charge of the next step?

Assumptions carried over from the home system cause most of the damage in these cases. The table sets them against what Italian procedure actually provides.

Expectation brought from homeWhat Italian procedure providesWhat it means here
Bail will secure releaseThere is no bail in ItalyRelease turns on the risks and on a suitable address
The command will resolve itCommand support does not affect the Italian caseIt may matter internally, and not before the Italian court
A plea can be negotiated with the prosecutorResolutions exist, on the code's own termsThey are examined with counsel rather than assumed
The case will move with the postingThe proceedings stay where the facts occurredAttendance or representation has to be arranged from abroad
A transfer home ends the matterIt does not end anythingNotices continue, so an address for service is essential
Living on base supplies an addressIt raises a question rather than answering oneA suitable address has to be proposed and documented

Choices in the days after an incident

Decisions arrive early, and each has a price that is easiest to see in advance.

Whether to speak to your command before a lawyer. Command support is natural, and the chain of command will want to know. But what you tell the command may be recorded and may reach the military justice system, which can run its own process on the same facts. Speaking to a lawyer beforehand costs little and avoids making statements that serve neither system.

Whether to engage Italian counsel of your own. The military legal office can explain how the arrangement between the states works and may help with liaison, but it does not act as your lawyer before an Italian court. An Italian lawyer chosen by you appears for you, and you decide what is said. Waiting to see what the Italian authority decides can mean missing early opportunities, such as the chance to give your account in the right form.

Whether to attend the Italian proceedings. Absence can be treated as unwillingness to cooperate, while attendance may involve leave, travel and a risk that you will be held. The answer depends on the charge, your status and the stage. It should be settled with the lawyer and the command together, so that leave and duty do not collide with court dates.

What to gather, and from whom

The Italian file will be built from police records, witness statements and reports. Your task is to assemble your own material, and the material that identifies your status.

  • Everything the Italian police gave you: a record of the stop or arrest, a notice, a summons, a ticket, with the date and the name of the unit.
  • Your identity and status documents: passport, military identification, orders that show your posting, and for dependants, the documents that show the family relationship.
  • The date, time and place of the incident, and whether you were on duty, off duty, on base or off base, written down immediately while memory is fresh.
  • Photographs and videos from the scene, messages, receipts from bars and restaurants, taxi or ride-share records.
  • Names and contact details of people who were with you or who saw the incident, noted for your lawyer only.
  • Any message from your command, legal office or family support about the incident, with dates.
  • Medical records, if you or another person was hurt, including the name of the hospital and the date of treatment.
  • Insurance information, including any coverage that could pay for legal costs or for damage.

Keep copies in a place that is not on the base network, and give the lawyer copies, not originals.

How an Italian case affects service, family and pay

The effects of an Italian case on military life are often larger than the effects on civilian life, because career, housing and security status depend on conduct. A service member facing an Italian charge may be restricted in duties, suspended from certain tasks, or placed on a hold that prevents transfer or leave. A pending case can delay a posting home, a promotion or a re-enlistment.

Security clearance is a concern. Many roles need a clearance, and an arrest abroad may require a report to security officers. Failing to report can create its own problem, and reporting can lead to a review. The legal consequences of an Italian case and the career consequences move on different clocks, and the member must watch both.

Family life is touched immediately. Housing on or near a base may depend on the member's status, and a dependant who is charged may face rules of the community as well as the courts. Spouses worry about visas, schooling and the cost of a lawyer. Children may be affected by stress and by rumours on base.

Money matters in unexpected ways: Italian fines and compensation must be paid in euros, legal costs are separate, and pay can be affected if duties are restricted. Practical steps include keeping a clear record of every appointment, informing the right people in the right order, and avoiding discussion of the case in barracks or in family groups.

Questions for the lawyer who deals with both systems

Service members often ask whether Italy will give the case back to their command. Better questions help you plan.

  • Who has the primary right to deal with this incident, given where and when it happened and my duty status?
  • Has Italy already taken up the case, and can that decision be changed?
  • If the Italian authority proceeds, what will the case look like, and which court will deal with it?
  • What will the military justice system do in parallel, and how do statements made to either side affect the other?
  • Does the military legal office act for me, and if not, who does?
  • Must I attend Italian hearings in person, and what happens if my duties prevent it?
  • If I am a dependant, what protections do I have, and who informs my sponsor?
  • How do fines, compensation to an injured person and costs work, and who pays?

The right answer may depend on documents you have not yet shown the lawyer, which is why the file comes before the strategy. Ask also which answers would change if the incident were found to have happened on duty, because that fact alone can shift the case between systems, and bring the relevant papers from your unit to the opening meeting. Ask who in the legal office will be your contact, and whether the lawyer may speak to that person with your permission.

One set of facts is examined by two processes with different purposes and speeds. The table compares them.

FeatureThe Italian criminal caseThe military or administrative process
What it decidesCriminal liability under Italian lawService consequences and administrative action
Who conducts itThe prosecutor and the Italian courtThe command, under its own procedures
What a statement costsAnything said enters the Italian fileAn account given internally can reach that file as well
What sets the timetableThe Italian code and the court's listingInternal rules, which usually move much faster
Who advisesItalian defence counselCounsel provided within the service
How they interactThe Italian outcome follows the person homeInternal action can precede any Italian decision

What not to do after an incident off base

The days after an incident are when well-meaning people make avoidable mistakes.

  • Do not assume the command will take care of it. Command support is real but does not replace a lawyer before an Italian court.
  • Do not give written statements to your command, to the base police or to a journalist before you have taken advice. They may be shared between systems.
  • Do not contact the injured person or witnesses to apologise or to ask them to change their account. It can look like pressure.
  • Do not discuss the incident on social media, in unit groups or on base forums. Posts are collected and compared with what you tell the authorities.
  • Do not ignore an Italian summons because you are on base. A missed hearing can lead to an order against you.
  • Do not leave Italy on a posting or leave without telling the lawyer. The case remains open, and notices will follow.
  • Do not delete messages, photographs or location data from the day. They may help you, and deletion can be detected.

When in doubt, say less, keep everything and ask a lawyer before taking any step. Families should follow the same rule. A spouse who posts about an arrest in a community group, or who calls a commander to complain, can make the position of the member harder, however good the intention.

An incident in separate legal systems

The arrangement between Italy and the United States divides responsibility between them, and the person in the middle needs to understand how it is meant to work. For acts done in the course of duty, and for offences against American personnel or property, the sending state has the primary right. For other conduct, including off-duty, off-base conduct, Italy has it. Both systems can have an interest in the same facts, and the question of which system acts earliest affects how the case moves.

In practice, the Italian authority often learns of an incident earliest, because the police were called. It begins to investigate, and the command is informed. The American side may then take its own steps, including administrative or disciplinary action, while Italy proceeds. A statement given to either may be requested by the other, and the member must assume that anything said will be read in both places.

Documents are a practical issue. Papers in Italian need translations, and papers from the base, such as orders or records of duty, may need certification before an Italian court uses them. Calls between an Italian lawyer, a legal office on base and relatives in the United States cross several time zones, so set up a routine and confirm in writing. The consulate of the United States can confirm identity and provide help with documents for citizens, but it does not act as counsel. If you have a lawyer at home for family or immigration issues, tell the Italian lawyer, who can then coordinate.

How the studio acts for personnel and families

The studio is used to working with people who have a command, a base and a home country together. An initial contact can be a message or a call from the member, a spouse, a parent or a legal office, and the call can be held in English. The studio asks for the papers listed above as clear photographs or PDF files, and a lawyer reads them quickly.

A written letter of instruction sets out the work and the fees, and a power of attorney allows the lawyer to act before the Italian authorities. The lawyer establishes who has the primary right in your case, what the Italian authority has done and what remains to be done. The studio explains in plain language how the Italian procedure runs, and what the next step will be.

It coordinates with the military legal office to the extent you permit, so that dates, leave and statements do not collide, while making clear that the Italian lawyer acts for you alone. Offices in Rome, Milan and Naples allow meetings in person, including near the bases, and urgent situations, such as an arrest on a weekend, are handled at any hour. The studio also works with interpreters when needed. It does not promise that the case will be given up to your command, and will say plainly when a step may do more harm than good. It keeps family members informed if you wish.

Words on the Italian papers

The papers use Italian terms that determine what happens next.

  • Giurisdizione concorrente is concurrent jurisdiction, the situation in which states each have a claim to deal with the same facts, as under the NATO Status of Forces Agreement.
  • Giurisdizione is jurisdiction, the power of a court or state to deal with a case.
  • Fermo is a police hold, a short detention that must be reviewed by a judge.
  • Persona offesa is the injured party, who has rights to be informed and to take part.
  • Querela is a complaint by the injured party, which in some offences is needed for the case to proceed.
  • Interprete is the interpreter, to whom you are entitled when you do not understand Italian.
  • Udienza is a hearing before a court or a judge.

If a document contains any other term, send a photograph of it to the lawyer before replying. Some words deserve particular care. A hold by the police is short and must be reviewed by a judge, and it differs from a decision to keep you in custody. A complaint by the injured party can sometimes be withdrawn, which may end an offence that depends on it, and the papers will say whether this applies. These points are not promises, but they are worth raising on the opening call, with the document in front of the lawyer. Also look at the heading of any paper from the police: it usually names the unit and the date, and both facts are used to count the time limits.

About the lawyer

People write to this office from places where Italian is not spoken, and often with documents they cannot read. That is the starting point of the work rather than an obstacle to it. Avv. Massimo Romano practises criminal law and appears before the Court of Cassation; alongside ordinary Italian proceedings he deals with surrender requests, extradition, and the situation of foreign nationals facing charges in Italy. Send or read out what you have: a notice, a receipt from a search, the name of the prison, a lawyer's letter in another language. He will tell you what the document is and what it obliges you to do. The call is followed by a written note setting out what the office can take on, how the file will be handled between Rome, Milan and Naples, and who in the family will be kept informed. Those conversations are held in English whenever that is what the family needs.

Write on WhatsApp or call. Have ready the identity details of the person concerned and a photograph of every page you have received, in whatever language it is written.

Avv. Massimo Romano — criminal defence lawyer, admitted to the Italian Court of Cassation
Iscritto all'Ordine degli Avvocati di Napoli n. 14553 | Patrocinante in Cassazione dal 23/10/2015
Roma, Via Avicenna 97, 00146 · Milano, Via Giuseppe Pecchio 3, 20129 · Napoli, Corso Umberto I 237, 80138
+39 335 669 3954 · WhatsApp

Reachable 24 hours

Tell me what has happened

First contact is free and covered by professional privilege, at any hour including nights and holidays.

Bar of Naples, admission no. 14553 · Rome · Milan · Naples

WhatsAppCall now
Write on WhatsApp